You have commented 338 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
CIA denies claim that Benghazi annex held Libyan prisoners
2012-11-13
The Central Intelligence Agency denied charges Sunday that its annex in Benghazi, Libya secretly held a few jihadi prisoners until it was destroyed in the Sept. 11, 2012 attack. Paula Broadwell, the girlfriend then-CIA chief Gen. David Petraeus, made that claim during an Oct. 26 speech in Denver, Colo.

"I don't know if a lot of you have heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back," Broadwell declared during the speech, at the University of Denver.

The CIA's denial came just hours after Arutz Sheva, an Israeli news outlet, first published a partial transcript of Broadwell's speech. By midnight Sunday, intelligence reporters with both The Daily Beast and The Washington Post were reporting and tweeting, respectively, that the CIA said her claim was false.

An agency spokesperson told The Daily Beast that "[t]he CIA has not had detention authority since January 2009, when Executive Order 13491 was issued. Any suggestion that the Agency is still in the detention business is uninformed and baseless."

One possible explanation, The Daily Beast wrote, is that Broadwell was confused about a report she had heard that day on the Fox News Channel.

"According to a source on the ground at the time of the attack," Fox News' Jennifer Griffin reported Oct. 26, "the team inside the CIA annex had captured three Libyan attackers and was forced to hand them over to the Libyans. U.S. officials do not know what happened to those three attackers and whether they were released by the Libyan forces."
Champ and his people have previously said that we're not holding prisoners anywhere except Gitmo and Bagram. If that turns out not to be true it's quite a game-changer. Too bad we didn't know about it before the election...
Posted by:Steve White

#2  Yeah, well at this point their credibility is a little suspect.
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-11-13 09:57  

#1  Of course they deny it; how could they not? But who could believe anything the CIA says anyway? Public truth has never been part of their 'ROE'.
Posted by: Glenmore   2012-11-13 09:00  

00:00