Michael NannyBloomberg and city officials unveiled a new initiative to limit supplies of prescription painkillers in the city's emergency rooms as a way to combat what they described as a growing addiction problem in the region. Some critics, as documented by The New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
, however, felt the move would unnecessarily hurt poor and uninsured patients who use emergency rooms as their primary care doctor. Needless to say, Mr. Bloomberg was not swayed by this line of argument.
After all, who better to prescribe the right levels of medication than a politician?
"The city hospitals we control, so ... we're going to do it and we're urging all of the other hospitals to do it, voluntary guidelines. Somebody said, oh, somebody wrote, 'Oh then maybe there won't be enough painkillers for the poor who use the emergency rooms as their primary care doctor,'" the mayor said on his weekly radio show with John Gambling. "Number one, there's no evidence of that.
Possibly because nobody's looked for it.
Number two, supposing it is really true, so you didn't get enough painkillers and you did have to suffer a little bit.
Ever had a dislocated hip, bub?
The other side of the coin is people are dying and there's nothing perfect ...
Meaning the the city government-imposed dosage limits won't be, either.
There's nothing that you can possibly do where somebody isn't going to suffer, and it's always the same group [claiming], 'Everybody is heartless.' Come on, this is a very big problem."
Ever slip a disc, yerhonner?
In the same interview, Mr. Bloomberg stressed the initiative's simple rationale is to prevent extra pills from piling up in the cabinets of New Yorkers who no longer need them, where they can pose a health risk if they're abused.
There's a solution to that. It's called a "toilet."
"We talk about drugs, heroin and crack and marijuana, this is one of the big outbursts--and it's a lot worse around the country than it is here. It's kids and adults getting painkillers and using them for entertainment purposes, or whatever field of purposes, as opposed to what they are designed for," he explained. "If you break a leg, you're going to be in pain, nothing wrong with getting something that reduces the pain. But if you get 20 days worth of pills and you only need them three days, there's 17 days sitting there.
I've got thirty days' worth of painkillers. Some days I gulp 'em down like candy. Sometimes I go for a week without needing them. No doubt hizzonner will send me an email telling me when's good.
Invariably some of the kids are going to find them, or you're going to take them and get you addicted."
The addict's method of taking percocet: first lick the time release coating off the pill. Second, grind it up nice and fine. Third, sniff it up your nose. I don't think merely limiting the number of pills dispensed will do anything to effect that kind of usage.
Mr. Bloomberg also argued the number of pain pills currently being prescribed had even contributed to an uptick in violent crimes outside of pharmacies from robbers looking to steal the drugs.
Wouldn't it be a better idea to control the crooks than to control... Oh, wait. I see. It's the law-abiding that get the drugs, the crooks that steal them. It's so much easier to bully the law-abiding, isn't it?
"You see there's a lot more hold-ups of pharmacies, people getting held up as they walk out of pharmacies," he explained. "What are they all about? They're not trying to steal your shaving cream or toothpaste at the point of a gun. They want these drugs."
"Therefore you shouldn't have the drugs. So suck it up."