You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
IAEA delegation to visit Tehran on Wednesday
2013-01-15
The IAEA delegation will visit Tehran on Wednesday, Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said, speaking live on Iranian television, IRINN reported. According to Mehmanparast, one of the Deputy head of IAEA will be the one visiting Iran.

Recently, chief of the IAEA Yukiya Amano said he is not optimistic about talks with Iran next week on getting access to Parchin military complex in Iran.

"The outlook is not bright," Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said in Tokyo. He was referring to talks to be held next week on getting access to the Parchin military base and officials involved in Iran's nuclear programme.
Posted by:Steve White

#1  DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > IRAN WAR COULD DESTROY AMERICA'S SUPERPOWER STATUS: AMERICAN ANALYSTS.

Lest we fergit, NOSTRADAMUS = "... ... Until the SEVEN/SEVENTH holds the Line".

[1960's Guam Taotamonas + CALHOUN'S COMMAND here]. Mitch Bouyer telling young Scout Curley to escape while he Bouyer stays behind to fight to the end wid Custer.

versus

* WORLD NEWS > [Newsday] IRAN COULD BUILD BOMB [Uranium-based] BY MID-2014.

RELATED SAME > IRAN SET FOR 2014 NUCLEAR CAPABILITY: US THINK-TANK.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > SYRIA: 50 TONNES OF URANIUM + NUCLEAR BOMBS | [International]FEARS GROWS OVER SYRIA'S URANIUM STOCKPILE - FT, espec Iran's access or ambitions for same.

US Perts are basically affirming what Iran Officios proclaimed late last year + earlier this Month.

WILL IRAN'S BALLYHOOED "JAPAN/EGYPT", "PEACEFUL", "NUKE BOMBS ARE FOR IDJUTS" CIVIE NUCENERGY MODEL = DEVOL INTO THE MORE MEDIA, GEOPOL AGGRESSIVE "NORTH KOREA" MODEL, I.E. IRAN LOUDLY + PUBLICLY + THREATENINGLY PROCLAIMING IT HAS DE FACTO NUCBOMBS WHILE MOST US-WORLD PERTS ARGUE THE OPPOSITE???

Will Iran = DPRK + start ambiguously subjectively diatribing about its necessity to build NucBombs + to "bolster its War/NucWar Deterrence" due to continuing US-Allied military threats agz the Country + its NucProgs???

"Mid-2014" or 2014 = waiting for the Bammer to become a "Lame-Duck" POTUS???
Lest we fergit, EITHER IRAN GETS ATTACKED + INVADED, OR IRAN GETS ITS NUKES.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-01-15 00:54  

00:00