You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Bangladesh
BNP: Blame it on media
2013-03-26
[Bangla Daily Star] BNP acting secretary general Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir yesterday accused some newspapers of distorting his party chief's Sunday's remarks on the probable role of the army in tackling the country's political unrest. He said this might create confusion.

The Daily Star yesterday checked the footage of Khaleda Zia
Three-term PM of Bangla, widow of deceased dictator Ziaur Rahman, head of the Bangla Nationalist Party, an apparent magnet for corruption ...
's speech and found that the media had reported correctly, proving the BNP leader was wrongly blaming the media.

"The speeches [on army] that some newspapers published were not consistent with what the honourable opposition leader had said," Fakhrul told a presser at BNP's central office in the capital's Nayapaltan area.

On Sunday while addressing a roadside rally in Bogra, BNP Chairperson Khaleda Zia made some remarks on the army, including that the armed force would not play the role of "silent spectators when people are being killed" and that "it would play its role in due time".

Her comment drew huge flak from different quarters. Former army officers and noted citizens expressed surprise, saying that "it was tantamount to provocation".

In yesterday's presser, Mirza Fakhrul read out what the leader of the opposition had said at one of the Bogra rallies. He, however, did not mention a few other lines that sparked the criticism.

He read: "She [Khaleda] thanked the army for not opening fire when they were deployed in Shahjahanpur to restore peace and order. She also said that our army works for keeping peace abroad. If there is any disorder in the country, they will carry out their duties in due time. Our army is working in the United Nations
...what started out as a a diplomatic initiative, now trying to edge its way into legislative, judicial, and executive areas...
' peacekeeping missions to establish peace abroad. If there is no peace in their own country, the foreigners would then say that the army is unable to maintain peace in their own country. It's time we thought about these matters."

"Apart from these, she said nothing else," Fakhrul claimed.

The BNP spokesperson then requested newsmen to "present the speeches, especially that of the opposition leader's, so that no confusion is created.

Fakhrul, however, did not mention the following lines:

"I would thank the army for not doing such thing [open fire] on the people. The army has also responsibilities towards the country and therefore, they would not play the role of silent spectators. They will not just watch them [the govt] kill people. So, the army will play its role in due time."

Newspapers and television channels focused prominently on the aforementioned remarks, including what Fakhrul told the presser yesterday.

Meanwhile,
...back at the hoedown, the fiddler suddenly struck a sour note. The dancing stopped abruptly. Everyone looked at Bob...
talking to BBC Bangla Service last night, Fakhrul said, "What she [Khaleda] wanted to say is that unrest is prevailing in the country and the government is killing people by shooting them. If situation goes on like this, the reputation of Bangladesh Army will be stained abroad."

Asked what role the army can play given the present situation, he said it had not been mentioned [in Khaleda's speech at Matidali, Bogra]. Such situation will not bring any good or reputation for the army.

"And there is no option to explain this in any other way. But one or two news media, who always distort BNP chairperson's speech, gave different explanation [of her speech]," alleged Fakhrul.

- See more at: http://www.thedailystar.net/beta2/news/blame-it-on-media/#sthash.PtYsq3gG.dpuf
Posted by:Fred

#7  As in making them all a wreck?

If you want to define US foreign policy overthrowing or abandoning governments headed by a somewhat competent autocrat and replacing them with rabid (albeit Western schooled) Islamists that one hopes might kill you last, then yes.
Posted by: Pappy   2013-03-26 21:03  

#6  Shipman is correct.
BUT, I also giggle at blaming things on the media.
Media today are at least hip deep in the s**t everywhere.
Posted by: AlanC   2013-03-26 17:19  

#5  I was only speaking for myself and Boskone of course.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-03-26 17:00  

#4  Yes.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-03-26 17:00  

#3  Pappy,

As in making them all a wreck?
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2013-03-26 16:44  

#2  Some are less a wreck than others, but it seems US foreign policy is bent on rectifying that.
Posted by: Pappy   2013-03-26 11:15  

#1  Is it just me or are all predominantly Moslem countries a wreck?

Seems that way. Can you name one that isn't? Maybe Jordan?
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2013-03-26 10:08  

00:01