You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan officials bar candidates using rarely used religious rule
2013-04-06
[GUARDIAN.CO.UK] Dozens of candidates, including the former military ruler Pervez Perv Musharraf
... former dictator of Pakistain, who was less dictatorial and corrupt than any Pak civilian government to date ...
, have been excluded from some constituencies in the coming Pak elections after being subjected by officials to a rigorous test of their religious credentials and "moral character" under a rarely invoked constitutional clause.

Musharraf, who ruled Pakistain between 1999 and 2008, returned to the country last month after nearly four years in self-imposed exile in a bid to relaunch his political career.

The exact reasoning behind the election commission's decision to bar him from the polls in Kasur in Punjab province was unclear last night. However,
denial ain't just a river in Egypt...
Musharraf remains a deeply divisive
...politicians call things divisive when when the other side sez something they don't like. Their own statements are never divisive, they're principled...
figure, detested by many conservatives and lawyers. The former commando also faces a variety of serious criminal charges against him, including murder, and could now face disqualification in the three other constituencies where he plans to run.

As well as those already blocked, hundreds more candidates face rejection as the verification process, run by judges appointed as electoral officials, continues. The test is being seen as a new clash between elected representatives and an activist judiciary, as well as a further contest between religious conservatives and relative moderates.

"It is creating a rift ... though there is some support for the judges there is growing anger," said Rasul Bakhsh Rais, Professor of Political Science at Lahore University of Management Sciences.

Articles 62 and 63 of the constitution demand that a candidate be a "good Moslem of integrity and honesty" who practises Islam and is knowledgeable about the religion.
Posted by:Fred

#6  "a candidate be a "good Moslem of integrity and honesty'"

So nobody's running?
Posted by: Barbara   2013-04-06 14:10  

#5   a candidate be a "good Moslem of integrity and honesty"

I'd make a snide remark about the oxymoronity of that statement but substitute 'person' for Moslem and it would seem equally unlikely, even here.
Posted by: Glenmore   2013-04-06 11:00  

#4  Writing stuff like this gets you banned from elections in Pakistan

But to recap the usual factors held responsible for the founding of Pakistan, Islam was not in danger in pre-1947 India. Indeed, considering the sectarian violence and religious bigotry we face today, it was in better health then. Nor was democracy the issue because even if partition had not happened, India was getting democracy once the British left. The Indian Independence Act promised that.

So what was the compelling reason for the Muslims to insist on a separate homeland especially when there was no going around the uncomfortable fact that, no matter how generously the frontiers of the new state were drawn, an uncomfortably large number of Muslims would remain in India?

The purpose of Pakistan, transcending anything to do with safeguarding Islam or promoting democracy, was to create conditions for the Muslims of India, or those who found themselves in the new state, to recreate the days of their lost glory.
Posted by: john frum   2013-04-06 10:50  

#3  The journalist Ayaz Amir was disqualified for insufficient adherence to the ideology of Pakistan.

Posted by: john frum   2013-04-06 10:47  

#2  It appears that at least one candidate was disqualified because of inability to show circumcision in the proper Islamic fashion.
Posted by: john frum   2013-04-06 10:46  

#1  I think they should drop articles 62 and 63 of their constitution . The problem is right there . Crazy notion , I know ;)
Posted by: Foxy   2013-04-06 10:38  

00:00