You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Got him! Dzhokhar in custody
2013-04-20
WATERTOWN – A flurry of applause at the scene of a standoff between police and Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev signaled his capture Friday night.

After a nearly two-hour standoff in a Watertown neighborhood, Tsarnaev was taken from the scene by ambulance to a local hospital.

The standoff began just before 7 p.m., minutes after Massachusetts State Police announced that they had completed their door-to-door search in Watertown without locating Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

WBZ-TVÂ’s Jim Armstrong was in the area of Franklin Street when he heard what he described as 15-20 seconds of rapid gunfire. He was forced to take cover, and was quickly moved back to safety by police.

Boston Mayor Tom Menino confirmed to WBZ-TV that police had surrounded the bombing suspect inside a boat in the backyard of a home on Franklin Street. Sources say that a resident called police to report finding blood by the boat. WBZ NewsRadio 1030 reported that authorities were able to confirm there was a person inside by using a thermal camera from a helicopter.

On the ground, Armstrong described a flurry of police activity that erupted moments after police wrapped up a press conference in which they lifted a day-long lockdown in Watertown, Boston and several surrounding communities. Police were seen carrying small children to safety. Because the lockdown had been lifted, there were people out on the streets when the gunfire started.

Additional loud bangs were heard around 7:50 p.m. – approximately one hour after the first gunshots were heard in the neighborhood.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Cowardly and errible as it was, we should be thankful hostages were not taken and that it was not another Beslan school massacre.

Overheard on the internet:

I watched the day-long coverage of the Boston bombers on Fox and CNN.

When one Fox host described the culprits as “punks,” former-senator and current current Fox commentator Scott Brown said, “Not punks—cowards. Cowards.” What is this need to describe terrorists as cowards? Is it supposed to make them feel inadequate? Call them savages, called them maniacal killers; no need to call them cowards. At the same time, the newscasters talk about how Boston residents were “terrorized” and “living in fear for the past few days.” Were they really? I think it’s unseemly to be terrorized by any problem a sidearm should be able to handle. If Bostonians were terrorized, I would apply the term cowards to them.


I'm inclined to agree. Anyone who's willing to take on the entire law enforcement and military infrastructure of the country - which numbers over a million paid and trained full-time professionals equipped with the latest that our hundred-billion dollar a year procurement budget can buy - by perpetrating these acts can't be described as a coward. If that infrastructure did not exist, and the attackers were doing this at will, sure.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2013-04-20 18:58  

#6  "They" missed looking in the boat cause the boat was outside the cordon.

What I want to know is why he returned to Watertown (probably has to do with his brother) since he was in Dartmouth ~60 miles south on Wed. after the bombs went off.
Posted by: AlanC   2013-04-20 14:41  

#5  Agree on that one. As ugly and awful as Beslan was in Russia, such an act would very much tear at our own social fabric.
Posted by: Steve White   2013-04-20 10:45  

#4  Cowardly and errible as it was, we should be thankful hostages were not taken and that it was not another Beslan school massacre.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-04-20 09:19  

#3  Firstly, I certainly applaud the work of Local Law Enforcement. Don't wish to sound like an armchair quarterback however, some very interesting Rules of Engagement (ROE) appeared to be in play when compared to what was mandated in Iraq and AFG. If they had PI [positive ID] and returned fire, there were some very poorly placed shots. Might [might] be something to look in to in the After Action Report and Lessons Learned session. Just saying.

At this juncture, I am more interested in the financials, communications, potential network, and the tools used. Weapons, fuses, explosives, detonators, fone circuit boards, and training. I hope we learn more about these aspects and they don't somehow go behind the Benghazi 'Green Door'.

Posted by: Besoeker   2013-04-20 09:02  

#2  Some were theorizing it was a police trick, to lure him out - declaring the area "cleared". The WaPo said a homeowner (apparently came out after the all clear) discovered blood on his boat and peeked inside to find the seriously wounded suspect. Police then tried to stir him with a flash-bang, but still got no response.

All the shooting? Where was Fearless Fosdick? Who missed looking inside the boat?
Posted by: Bobby   2013-04-20 08:45  

#1  Were Batmon and Rubin involved?
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2013-04-20 08:03  

00:00