You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Obama: U.S. Has 'Moral' Obligation in Syria
2013-05-08
This week anyway. But the week is half over, so there's time to reverse course again.
[An Nahar] U.S. President Barack Obama
Because I won...
said Tuesday he had both a moral and a national security obligation to stop the slaughter in Syria, but warned he could not just act on a "hope and a prayer."

Obama defended his government's actions in sending large quantities of humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees, providing non-lethal help to rebels and isolating Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad
Light of the Alawites...
in the international community.

"I think that understandably, there's a desire for easy answers," Obama said, referring to domestic critics who are demanding a more proactive U.S. role, including an operation to arm rebel groups and a no-fly zone.

"My job is to constantly measure our very real and legitimate humanitarian and national security interests in Syria, but measuring those against my bottom line, which is, what's in the best interests of America's security."

Obama said that he could not make decisions "based on a hope and a prayer, but on hard-headed analysis in terms of what will actually make us safer and stabilize the region."

"I think that we have both a moral obligation and a national security interest in, A, ending the slaughter in Syria but, B, also ensuring that we've got a stable Syria that is representative of all the Syrian people and is not creating chaos for its neighbors," he said.

The president spoke as political critics complain that he has not acted more quickly on reports that Syrian forces had used chemical weapons, an action he had previously said would infringe a red line and be a game-changer.
Posted by:Fred

#10  There are useful idiots, and there are useless idiots.......
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2013-05-08 18:37  

#9  We have a moral obligation to stay out of Syria.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-05-08 15:17  

#8  To protect Syria from Zionist Aggression?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-05-08 15:09  

#7  I disagree, sir. I don't think we owe the Syrians a damn thing.
Posted by: Muggsy Mussolini1226   2013-05-08 12:22  

#6  I have serious doubts that anyone writing policy on the middle east for the empty suit have a clue what they are talking about.

I see a lot of wishful thinking and social science gobble deegook in their theorizing about the middle east.

When someone comes out and admits the end game for the Moslems is world domination under their religion, convert or die, I would say we are making progress. As long as the PC crowd has the media by the throat and the Anti-American crowd has control of academia, that is not going to happen.

I think these guys running policy are the poster children for Lenin's "Useful Idiots."
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2013-05-08 10:03  

#5  Threater Flusoper, in a few short paragraphs you've captured the essence of a modern democrat.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-05-08 07:40  

#4  Um TF, can you please be a little less waffly and amibguous about how you feel? I'm not sure you made it quite clear enough. ;^)


Of course the problem is that even this language can't get through to the low IQ, low info voters that put this vicious moron in office.
Posted by: AlanC   2013-05-08 06:58  

#3  Nations have INTERESTS. The "morals" are usually another word for BS.

WHAT are the US Interests in Syria? I see Moslems killing Moslems. I can watch that all day.

That the Syrian situation will "de-stabilize" the region? The region ( all of it that is Moslem and what part ,except, Israel isn't) is one big toilet bowl of de-stabilised feces ALREADY.
NOTHING the US does in Syria is going to do anything but get it splashed on your shirt and then you get to WEAR the smelly shirt.

I wouldn't be in any big hurry to wear a crap smelling shirt.

Arming the "rebels"? The stinking Rebels are Moslems. Let's give the Moslems guns....and PAY for it ourselves? Here YOU wear that shirt. But go stand over there downwind,

Will they be our "friends" if we pay for their guns? Moslems ?
Who wants "friends" like that? You ARE deluded.

Obama is a coward. And he doesn't like the United States anymore than Assad does and he wouldn't fight for the United States, he never has. Obama won't DO anything but move his mouth. Do you doubt that for even a single second?
The leader of the United States was elected by people who want to let some uneducated soldier who lives in a trailer and can't find any "real" job ( ASK: Kerry ) do the heavy lifting while they spit on him.
Would YOU be willing to die for some Moslem s#*%hole? IN a Moslem s#%hole?

Salute the flag. Bend over. There IS no "moral obligations" to BE a Sucker.
Buy a gun, the Banana in Chief wants to make sure you can't.
Am I lyin' to 'ya?
Posted by: Threater Flusoper9823   2013-05-08 04:48  

#2  champ is not connected to reality
Posted by: Mikey Hunt   2013-05-08 01:34  

#1  Be a little more specific, O. I do not know what you really mean. (Maybe he does not know, either...)
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2013-05-08 01:24  

00:00