You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: WoT
Pressure mounts on Boehner to appoint select committee on Benghazi
2013-05-13
House Speaker John Boehner
...who is not going to be remembered as Speaker in the same way as John Quincy Adams or even Tip O'Neill...
is facing mounting pressure to create a special or select committee to investigate the Benghazi terror attacks in which four Americans were killed.

The House resolution to form a special committee now has at least 139 co-sponsors who are putting Boehner in the difficult position of leading efforts to get the White House to release emails on Benghazi-gate but not agreeing to the demands of many rank-and-file Republicans.
139 members: I'm guessing all Pubs. That means a majority of the majority party. That would ordinarily prompt a Speaker to do something...
The resolution is sponsored by Virginia Rep. Frank Wolf who suggested to Boehner in a forceful, four-page letter Thursday that the Obama administration perhaps failed to adequately prevent the deaths of the Americans killed and injured in the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the U.S. outpost in Benghazi, Libya, and that not appointing the committee could make the Republican-led House “complicit in that failure.”

An ABC News story said the CIAÂ’s explanation of the Benghazi events changed 12 different times before being made public.

Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said five days after the attacks, while making the rounds on the Sunday talk shows, that the strikes appeared to be “spontaneous” and sparked by protests elsewhere in the Middle East about an anti-Islamic video. However, references to “Islamic militants” and terror attacks in the original CIA reports were scrubbed from Rice’s final talk points.

Wolf said that after the ABC News report the number of co-sponsors increased to 144, about 60 percent of the House Republican Caucus.

“If you don’t use the subpoena power, people will not come in and testify, because if you’re 50 years old and you’re a federal employee, you have two kids, maybe two college tuitions, you have a mortgage on your house in Arlington County, you’re not going to risk your career,” Wolf told conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt on Friday.

He also said somebody from the Armed Services Committee should be included on the panel because the Defense Department is involved in the Benghazi matter. And the Intelligence Committee should be included because the CIA and the office of the Director of National Intelligence are also involved.

Boehner on Thursday again declined to commit to appointing a committee, saying he has “confidence” in the committees already holding investigations.
You get the sense that the Speaker would like all this to go away...
Posted by:Steve White

#8  Boner is slightly more useless than a bent shitcan. Needs to go.
Posted by: USN,ret   2013-05-13 21:26  

#7   age discrimination really does exist ?

Of course that is a rhetorical question, Besoeker. The key to post-age-50 employment is to be able to set up your own business, built upon your experience and expertise, but of course the Administration is doing its utmost to make that impossible too.
Posted by: Glenmore   2013-05-13 20:07  

#6  He is a coward; it would shock the $hit out of me if he actually did it....
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2013-05-13 19:54  

#5  ...because if you're 50 years old and you're a federal employee,..

Because no one has the 'smoking gun' in hand [other than maybe Vince Foster].
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-05-13 17:12  

#4  it means these bureacrats value their material things more than they do their oath to uhold and defend the constitutiton. Show some courage - those folks in Beghazi gave the last full measure of devotion, putting you rmaterial wealth at risk is peanuts compared to that.
Posted by: OldSpook   2013-05-13 16:28  

#3  
"If you don't use the subpoena power, people will not come in and testify, because if you're 50 years old and you're a federal employee, you have two kids, maybe two college tuitions, you have a mortgage on your house in Arlington County, you're not going to risk your career," Wolf told conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt on Friday.

There is an Office of Special Council whose job is to protect whistleblowers and protect the merit system. What Wolf is saying is that there are people who are afraid nonetheless, that when they tell the truth they will be punished by the Obama admin. This doesn't surprise me but I wish Wolk had been explicit in saying that.
Posted by: lord garth   2013-05-13 14:27  

#2  One problem is that when "select commitee" is used, the follow-on is always "Watergate".

Another problem is that select commitees are bipartisan. What made the select commitee on Watergate work was that senior Republicans were on board. Given the performance of Democrat members at last week's hearings, at this point it's a recipe for gridlock and eventual failure.

Personally, at this point I'd rather let the existing commitees do their work and let the press coverage continue to build momentum.
Posted by: Pappy   2013-05-13 14:01  

#1  because if you're 50 years old and you're a federal employee, you have two kids, maybe two college tuitions, you have a mortgage on your house in Arlington County, you're not going to risk your career," Wolf told conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt on Friday.

Er, huh, does this mean that folks over the age of 50 have a difficult time changing careers, and that age discrimination really does exist ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-05-13 08:59  

00:00