| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government |
| Axelrod: How could Obama know what his underlings were doing when the governmentÂ’s so big? |
| 2013-05-15 |
| Posted by:DarthVader |
| #8 A different EXCUSE, i DON'T BUY THAT EITHER. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2013-05-15 22:05 |
| #7 Effectively, Alexrod and the "reverse Nuremberg Defense". |
| Posted by: Lone Ranger 2013-05-15 19:59 |
| #6 And Texahooey, Rummy's statement is exactly correct. I was amazed at how it all just flowed off his tongue, but I had to stop and analyze each phrase to make sure I understood it. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2013-05-15 18:41 |
| #5 yeah,Crazyfool. My favorite Rummy statement was "because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know." I remember vividly his comment on tv that day. I laughed my ass off! |
| Posted by: Texhooey 2013-05-15 17:58 |
| #4 Government too big...uh oh, sounds like a Tea Party member; better sic the IRS on him just in case. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2013-05-15 17:25 |
| #3 ...yep, that was the standard the Left(tm) established. Of course, it's not hypocrisy when they do it. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2013-05-15 17:14 |
| #2 Yet Bush and Rumsfield were supposed to know and not only know about in minute detail but direct the details of each and everything that happened in some unknown prison in Iraq during a war. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2013-05-15 13:33 |
| #1 Sounds to me like the perfect argument for cutting government. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2013-05-15 12:50 |