You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Obama: US Not Backing Any Egyptian Party Or Group
2013-07-07
[HOSTED.AP.ORG] President Barack Obama
I am not a dictator!...
on Saturday reiterated that the U.S. is not aligned with and is not supporting any particular Egyptian political party or group and again condemned the ongoing violence across Egypt.

Obama made those points during a telephone conference with the National Security Council about developments in Egypt, according to a statement issued by the White House. He was spending the weekend at Camp David, the presidential retreat in Maryland.

"The United States categorically rejects the false claims propagated by some in Egypt that we are working with specific political parties or movements to dictate how Egypt's transition should proceed," the White House statement said. "We remain committed to the Egyptian people and their aspirations for democracy, economy opportunity and dignity. But the future path of Egypt can only be determined by the Egyptian people."

The White House statement repeated key assertions Obama and other U.S. officials have made since the Egyptian military ousted the democratically elected president of Egypt, calling for an inclusive process allowing for all groups and parties to participate, urging all Egyptian leaders to condemn the use of force and to prevent further violence, and urging demonstrators to conduct themselves peacefully.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel spoke again Saturday to Egypt's defense minister, emphasizing the need for a peaceful civilian transition in Egypt and noting "the importance of security for the Egyptian people, Egypt's neighbors and the region," the Defense Department said in a statement.
Posted by:Fred

#2  On the surface, it would appear that the Bammer's stance reflects the correct or proper position for the US in the ME - however, iff the Bammer is indeed an anti-US Marxist-Anarchist-Globalist as many Netters claim, then his staement is actually quite dangerous as per the Globalist premise of a post-Cold War, "MultiPolar" World where the present "sole" Global Superpower US is just one Power or Superpower amongst many on par.

The Bammer's statement is dangerous because Islam nor Radical Islam accepts parity wid any + all Non-Islam - "ISLAM MUST RULE, OR ISLAM WILL BE DESTROYED", as the Mullahs like to preach.

DITTO FOR RISING CHINA AS PER ITS PERCEIVED
"MANIFEST DESTINY" AS THE WORLD'S ONE-N-ONLY "POST-US" GLOBAL SUPERPOWER SUCCESSOR TO THE US.

IOW, BOTH OWG CALIPHATE, NUKE-HAPPY RADICAL ISLAM NOR "POST-US" CHINA DESIRE A TRULY "MULTIPOLAR" WORLD AS INTENDED OR PREMISED BY THE GLOBALISTS. ITV there can be no such thing as "parity".

The anti-US Globalists + aligned are taking a very dangerous, poten catastrophic unilateral risk iff they are acting on the premise that any rollback, peaceful or violent, of US Power-n-Influence WON'T BE INTERPRETED AS DE FACTO US "WEAKNESS" BY AGRESSIVE GEOPOL = POLI/POLITITICO-NUCLEAR RIVALS.

Everyone is an Indian, + no one is a Chief, or alternately there are too many Chiefs + no Indians - IIRC, either way thats how Lilith broke up wid Adam.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-07-07 22:48  

#1  I am (Technically) not a dictator!, (Not yet anyway).
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2013-07-07 16:20  

00:00