You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
School crisis drives families from city
2013-08-19
[PHILLY]
"When you live in the city, as soon as you have your first kid, you start thinking about schools," he said. "You hope your district will get better. Instead, it gets worse. Unless you have $35,000 a year [for] private school, at some point, you go, 'I just can't do this.' "

If their house sale goes through, the couple plan to move to a suburb where they hope their children, ages 5, 4, and 2, can attend fully functioning schools. Schools, Hackford said, that not only can afford adequate staffing for nurses, coaches, and field trips, but the bedrock basics. Books. Librarians. Guidance counselors. Secretaries to answer the phones.

That was the conclusion reached, too, by Marcy and Matthew Gialdo, who reluctantly left Philadelphia in the spring after living in the city's Mount Airy section for 10 years.

The Gialdos had sent their two children to a Quaker elementary school but knew they could not afford tuition that soars past $20,000 at most private high schools. After trying to win spots for their children in charter schools through the lottery system, they gave up.

"The chances of getting them into a good public school were slimmer and slimmer," said Marcy Gialdo. "And over the past few years, we watched programs eliminated and options lessened."

In May, the family decamped to Springfield Township in Montgomery County.

"It was a very hard decision," said Gialdo, 39, a triathlon coach. "I loved my neighborhood in Philadelphia.. . . The diversity was great for our family. We could walk everywhere. We had public transportation. We gave up a lot when we moved. But the school situation was just not possible."

As officials sparred over where to find the money, Gialdo, a former New Jersey public school teacher, said, "I feel there's a lot of finger-pointing and grandstanding. It's irresponsible of us as adults to do this to the kids. . . . How many years does it take to figure this out? . . . The children are the ones who get hurt."

After receiving the "urgent" request that Greenfield Elementary School's principal sent to parents, asking them to donate $613 for each child enrolled, Tomika Anglin was heartsick and angry.

"A lot of people cannot afford the money schools are asking for," said Anglin, a 45-year-old single mother. "And they recognize that it may be becoming normal to ask parents to contribute like that."

Anglin's solution for now: home-school her daughter, who would be starting sixth grade.

("But there are no secretaries at the school right now, so I have not formally withdrawn her.")
Posted by:Fred

#18  "In May, the family decamped to Springfield Township in Montgomery County"
Pennsylvania speak. Borrows, burgs,and townships.
Perhaps I missed it but Montgomery County I know very well. Potomac Maryland is the place to be but so expensive.
Posted by: Dale   2013-08-19 19:03  

#17  Dale,

What makes you think they moved to Maryland? And when did Maryland get townships?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2013-08-19 15:27  

#16  Good one, Besoeker
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-08-19 15:21  

#15  Homesick Snowbird

I was in Ft. Myers, Florida, the other day and I saw a bumper sticker on a parked car that read: "I miss Detroit".

So, I broke the window, stole the radio, shot out two tires, added an Obama bumper sticker and left a note that read, "I hope this helps!"
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-08-19 14:23  

#14  Another reason to separate schools and state.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2013-08-19 13:47  

#13  This sure is some new news, NOT.

My family was driven from NYC almost 60 years ago for these exact reasons. The lack of discipline and control in the Staten Island public schools convinced my parents to move to NJ.

All the same union and PC liberal ideas chased them out. Teacher friends of theirs told them that getting out was the right thing as it was only getting worse.

I repeat, that was 60 years ago...........
Posted by: AlanC   2013-08-19 13:24  

#12  Yeah. I'm wondering if the "diversity" is why they had to leave.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2013-08-19 11:39  

#11  
The diversity was great for our family.


In what ways?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2013-08-19 10:53  

#10  Those 55 and older have the money in this country these days.

And apparently the only ones buying dead tree media and watching the evening broadcast news. They'll die off with them. Talk about Karma.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-08-19 10:22  

#9  Dense populated cities are for the retired. No children areas like no dogs allowed. Slow death because replacement numbers will not be there in a few years. Those 55 and older have the money in this country these days. The young will not have the income for such areas. No need for cars. Like Europe and poor countries, mass transit. The seeds for the future will not be planted. Too rich, too smart, then no replacement.
Posted by: Dale   2013-08-19 09:33  

#8  There will be plenty of money for inner-city Mooslim schools and sharia courts when the Broederbond controls the Suez.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-08-19 08:48  

#7  I repeat, if they could they'd suppress the news about the flight of the taxpayers.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-08-19 08:45  

#6  The ministry of truth can't suppress every little thing?

Normally I'd agree, g(r)omgoru, but then there's this and this,not to mention Fred's two articles today, and that's just off the top of my head.
Posted by: trailing wife   2013-08-19 07:54  

#5  I have to wonder what is driving this spate of stories

The ministry of truth can't suppress every little thing?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-08-19 06:58  

#4  There are suddenly an awful lot of articles across the media abut the lack of amenities in cities that middle class families consider deal breakers -- decent schools and reasonable lack of crime, not to mention stroller- and child-friendly shops and restaurants. Not that I disagree -- that's why we never considered living in the city, after all -- but I have to wonder what is driving this spate of stories.
Posted by: trailing wife   2013-08-19 06:25  

#3  It's not just happening in the cities, it is happening everywhere and it effects nearly everything from housing to shopping, hospitals, policing, the lot.

Ice in a G&T is for chilling. Drink it before it melts, or order another.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-08-19 04:51  

#2  Montgomery County?, I left that area years ago. Howard county would have been better but not by much. They didn't do their homework. They will learn unfortunately. Sidwell Friends(Quaker) is there but that is for the wealthy. Al De Gore's children remember(who hears of Quakers anymore). Even Obama's for a time. Very, very expensive to live there. Traffic, many adjustments. Forget walking. They have made an unfortunate decision.
Posted by: Dale   2013-08-19 04:43  

#1  Both sides of this argument are delusional, governments run by self serving socialists (democrats) will see the same fate, you must learn that unionized school systems are not serving the citizens but the needs of the "educators".
Posted by: Unolulet Hupomoling9738   2013-08-19 00:39  

00:00