You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Obama's Secret Iran Détente
2013-11-09
The Obama administration began softening sanctions on Iran after the election of Iran's new president in June, months before the current round of nuclear talks in Geneva or the historic phone call between the two leaders in September.
If you'll recall we at the Burg have been running the occasional story about Iran trade and exports these last few months. Oil, NG, steel, cars, etc. We've had other stories about Iranian imports. Now understand all this was on a backdrop of what was supposed to be "tough" sanctions on Iran for its refusal to submit its nuclear weapons program to international inspection. At the time a reasonable person would have assumed that this was all about those crafty Persians finding ways to get around the sanctions.

But of course we should have considered the other possibility: that Champ simply waved his hands and cancelled the sanctions, the way he has done to so many other American laws. From this story in the Daily Beast (and all credit to them for pursuing it) it seems that he's been non-enforcing the sanctions for some months as a come-on to the Iranians so that they'll sign a deal that gives them the nuclear weapons they want and the fig leaf that Champ wants. Boy howdy what a tough deal for the Iranians, huh?
While those negotiations now appear on the verge of a breakthrough the key condition for Iran--relief from crippling sanctions--began quietly and modestly five months ago.

A review of Treasury Department notices reveals that the U.S. government has all but stopped the financial blacklisting of entities and people that help Iran evade international sanctions since the election of its president, Hassan Rouhani, in June.
The threat to blacklist an American bank compels said bank to stop doing business not just with the entities that are on the sanction list, but to stop doing business with the banks who are doing business with the banks who hold the money of the entities on the sanctions list. So having the Treasury Department say "no worries, we won't blacklist you" means full speed ahead in doing business.
On Wednesday Obama said in an interview with NBC News the negotiations in Geneva "are not about easing sanctions." "The negotiations taking place are about how Iran begins to meet its international obligations and provide assurances not just to us but to the entire world," the president said.

But it has also long been Obama's strategy to squeeze Iran's economy until Iran would be willing to trade relief from sanctions for abandoning key elements of its nuclear program.
No, that was George Bush's strategy. Champ has been looking for a couple years how to get a "deal" with Iran, and apparently he's found a way.
One way Obama has pressured Iran is through isolating the country's banks from the global financial sector, the networks that make modern international commerce possible. This in turn has led Iran to seek out front companies and cutouts to conduct routine international business, such as selling its crude oil.

In this cat and mouse game, the Treasury Department in recent years has routinely designated new entities as violators of sanctions, forcing Iran to adjust in turn. In the six weeks prior to the Iranian elections in June, the Treasury Department issued seven notices of designations of sanctions violators that included more than 100 new people, companies, aircraft, and sea vessels.

Since June 14, however, when Rouhani was elected, the Treasury Department has only issued two designation notices that have identified six people and four companies as violating the Iran sanctions.
Rouhani is seen by Champ and his people as a "moderate": this is nonsense of course. The Mad Mullahs™ do not believe in moderation and will not have such a person leading the country. Rouhani has blood on his hands. This is a case of Iranian public relations being swallowed by a gullible U.S. administration that desperately wants to believe what it hears so that it can cut a deal.
When an entity is designated as a sanctions violator it can be catastrophic. Banks and other investors almost never take the risk of doing business with the people and companies on a Treasury blacklist because of the potential reputational harm and the prospect they could lose access to U.S. financial markets.

A Treasury spokesman contacted by The Daily Beast said the effectiveness of sanctions should be measured by their results and not the number of entities designated. The Treasury spokesman also said that the significant financial pressure on Iran in recent years changed the calculus of the country's leaders and led to the election of Rouhani, who is a former nuclear negotiator and is considered more moderate than his predecessor.
Anyone who considers that is considering wrongly...
"In the months since the Iranian election we have continued to pursue our unwavering goal of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon," the spokesman said. "We have not let up on vigorous sanctions enforcement one iota. This includes new designations of sanctions evaders as well as other steps to address potential sanctions evasion."
This is eyewash.
But the enforcement of sanctions, experts said, is very different than the process of designating new violators. To start, sanctions enforcement means the levying of fines or other legal measures against those people and entities already designated by the Treasury Department as a violator.

The designation process is more proactive. "The designations are important because they identify illicit actors that are abusing the international financial sector in addition to signaling the U.S. intention to isolate Iran's economy," said Avi Jorisch, a former U.S. Treasury official who has worked closely on Iran sanctions and has advocated for toughening these sanctions since leaving government.
Whereas now we see that it's going in the opposite direction.
Advocates of sanctions relief also acknowledge that the administration has pursued a policy of quietly lessening financial pressure on Iran. They argue that was a logical policy when married to the process of renewing diplomatic negotiations with Iran, which according to the Wall Street Journal this week, has been going on for several months.
The alternative, of course, is to maintain sanctions and tell the Iranians that the sanctions will only be loosened IF and ONLY IF a satisfactory deal is made on the nuclear issue. That would allow us to have considerable leverage. Champ has thrown that away. Of course.
"Before the election there were a lot of these designations," said Trita Parsi, the executive director of the National Iranian American Council, a group that has advocated for ending sanctions on Iran since. "Their impact was probably not decisive, but it was a way for the White House to signal to the Iranians and Congress they were going forward with the sanctions train." Parsi continued: "After the election [the Obama administration] wanted to give the opposite signal, a pause. The last thing you would want to do is let the sanctions train go forward and potentially scuttle an opportunity that could have been there."
Why? If the Iranians want a deal after their election, let THEM come to US. Let them open with a suggestion for a deal rather than have us loosen sanctions. They're the ones who are supposedly hurting.
Following the Iranian elections, there were also a lot of changes inside the Iranian government, making the task of designating officials and entities a bit more tricky, Parsi said. But a significant part of the administration's decision, in Parsi's opinion, was the belief that continuing a high pace of designations would "undermine the signal that they were trying to send, that there was an opening."

Mark Dubowitz, the executive director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, an organization that has worked closely with Congress and the administration on devising the current Iranian sanctions, said the slow pace of designations was only one kind of sanctions relief Obama has been offering Iran.

"For five months, since Rouhani's election, the United States has offered Iran two major forms of sanctions relief," Dubowitz said. "First there's been a significant slowdown in the pace of designations while the Iranians are proliferating the number of front companies and cutouts to bust sanctions."

The second kind of relief Dubowitz said the White House had offered Iran was through its opposition to new Iran sanctions legislation supported by both parties in Congress.

By Dubowitz's estimates, Iran is now selling between 150,000 and 200,000 barrels of oil per day on the black market, meaning that Iran has profited from the illicit sale of over 35 million barrels of oil since Rouhani took office, with little additional measures taken by the United States to counter it.
Not just oil. Look at the cushy relationship it now has with al-Maliki in Iraq: Iran could easily ship through Iraq, or "sell" Iraq electricity, etc.
"Sounds like Obama decided to enter the Persian nuclear bazaar to haggle with the masters of negotiation and has had his head handed to him," Dubowitz said.
Posted by:Steve White

#16  For Israel, this is no time to be timid nor reckless. But it is a time to be decisive and aggressive. Israel has an existential problem with Iran. She also has a second order existential problem with Obama and some European powers. She is a thorn in their side. Obama would not mind Israel ceasing to exist. He just wants someone else to do it.

So, how can Bibi make this disaster into an opportunity? It seems to me that he and the Saudi king have something in common. Iran is a threat to both of them. Two against Iran is better than one. The Saudis want to nuke up, fine. Go for it. Saudis can provide bases for strikes and other under the table support for Israel, maybe even for subs. Never know. Put a little fear into the Mad Mullahs®.

On the US home front, Bibi needs to sic the US Congress on Obama and his little mutt Kerry. Sowing a little discord could be helpful to his cause, and us Just Plain Joes here in the US. Bring down Obama a notch. Isolate him from his base.

All fronts are fair when your very existence is at stake. Just a few ideas.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2013-11-09 23:22  

#15  ...schadenfreude sucks when you are observing it from the muzzle...
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2013-11-09 22:25  

#14   I want to see journos dangling from lampposts for paving this traitor's road to the presidency.

Would you be satisfied to see many of them lose their jobs as their employers continue the downsizing that's been going on most of the past decade, Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)?
Posted by: trailing wife   2013-11-09 20:52  

#13  if all of this ends as badly as I think it could, I want to see journos dangling from lampposts for paving this traitor's road to the presidency.
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2013-11-09 16:14  

#12  The destruction of a traditional American foreign policy in the Mahgrib and Middle East in just five years is breathtaking.

Is it more, or less, breathtaking than the destruction of our economy and the Republic?
Posted by: Secret Asian Man   2013-11-09 11:48  

#11  Amazing! The Obama cabal has managed to alienate Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Israel. It presided over the destruction of Libya, assisted in the division of Iraq, failed to assist the Syria rebels when help was most needed. It supports Turkey's Erdogen, a Muslim Brother, and is making plans to bug out in Afghanistan muy pronto.

The destruction of a traditional American foreign policy in the Mahgrib and Middle East in just five years is breathtaking.
Posted by: Count Galeazzo Dark Lord of the Antelope2280   2013-11-09 08:57  

#10  From the Washington Times.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-11-09 07:21  

#9  March 15, 2013 WASHINGTON - In a display of unity between allies who often disagree, President Barack Obama assured Israel's visiting leader Monday that the United States "will always have Israel's back," and said the U.S. and Israel agree that diplomacy is the best way to resolve the crisis over potential Iranian nuclear weapons.

...and if you like your heath care plan, you can keep it.
Posted by: tu3031   2013-11-08 22:10  

#8  ...worth a peek...: Iran Successfully Plays for Time
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2013-11-08 19:41  

#7  Egyptions kicked his Muslim Bros out of office in a flash, Syria's Pencil Neck is still king of Damascus and now he supports Iran. Yep. Not a good omen for the Mullahs. Israel will now smack these rag heads.
Posted by: Guillibaldo McCoy1948   2013-11-08 18:57  

#6  Well, Airandee, you remember the Dims didn't want to negotiate with the "terrorist" Pubs, only the new, friendlier, Iranians... [gag]
Posted by: Bobby   2013-11-08 17:20  

#5  So Obama was willing to negotiate, compromise and give in first to Iranians. But not republicans. Maybe ted Cruz should hire the Ayatollah to negotiate the next debt ceiling crisis.
Posted by: Airandee   2013-11-08 17:08  

#4  (Valerie) Jarrett was born in Shiraz, Iran, to multiple-racial parents James E. Bowman and Barbara Taylor Bowman. Her father, a pathologist and geneticist, ran a hospital for children in Shiraz in 1950, as part of a program where American physicians and agricultural experts sought to help jump-start developing countries' health and farming efforts. When she was five, the family moved to London for one year, later moving to Chicago in 1963

Symp
Posted by: Frank G   2013-11-08 15:11  

#3  It would be awfully nice if, in the next week or so, Israel does what must be done in the direction of Iran. It would be even nicer if every single Republican legislator at all levels from the merest unincorporated village to the united Senators in Washington reared up on their hind legs to condemn this betrayal of israel in the strongest terms. Let the Democrats scramble to keep up on this issue, too, and leave the president seeing himself standing alone in spotlight.
Posted by: trailing wife   2013-11-08 14:04  

#2  If you see one cockroach, you have an infestation.
Posted by: Iblis   2013-11-08 13:45  

#1  "Sounds like Obama decided to enter the Persian nuclear bazaar to haggle with the masters of negotiation and has had his head handed to him,"...yeah, we all could have predicted that.

The ONE is such a light weight. He thinks he is so much smarter than anyone else and he has this big ego about how persuasive he is.

Trouble is he's a Chihuahua in a pit bull kennel with the Iranians.

I guess he never heard the old saying about rug dealers.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2013-11-08 12:14  

00:00