You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Israel, Saudi Arabia working on Iran strike plan
2013-11-17
Israel is working on coordinating plans for a possible military strike with Saudi Arabia, with Riyadh prepared to provide tactical support to Jerusalem, a British newspaper reported early Sunday. The two countries have both united in worry that the West may come to terms with Iran, easing sanctions and allowing the Islamic Republic to continue its nuclear program.

According to the Sunday Times, Riyadh has agreed to let Israel use its airspace in a military strike on Iran and cooperate over the use of rescue helicopters, tanker planes and drones.

"The Saudis are furious and are willing to give Israel all the help it needs," an unnamed diplomatic source told the paper.

The report comes as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in the midst of a blitz to lobby against a deal and cobble together an international alliance opposed to an agreement that allows Iran to continue enriching uranium.

On Sunday, Israel will welcome French president Francois Hollande, who a week earlier put the kibosh on a deal between six world powers and Iran that would ease sanctions in return for initial steps toward curbing enrichment. Netanyahu on Friday urged France to remain firm in its pressure on Iran ahead of a new round of talks on the Islamic Republic's nuclear program in Geneva, kicking off Wednesday.

After meeting Hollande, Netanyahu will head to Moscow on Wednesday to meet with President Vladimir Putin and lobby against the deal.

Should a deal be reached, according to the diplomatic source, a military option would be back on the table. Saudi tactical support, in lieu of backup from the Pentagon, would be vital for a long-range mission targeting Iran's nuclear program.

Saudi Arabia, a Sunni Muslim country across the Persian Gulf from Iran has long been at odds with Tehran, and fears a nuclear weapon would threaten Riyadh and set off a nuclear arms race in the region.
Posted by:Steve White

#14  More ...

* WORLD NEWS > [Siasat Daily] IRAN: NO NEED FOR WEST TO DECLARE [inalienable = natural = self-evident] ENRICHMENT RIGHT.

FM Mohammed Javad Zarif.

"Iran holds these Truths to be Self-Evident ... ... And that among these Rights is the Right to Life, Liberty, + the Pursuit of Uranium or Plutonium".

* SAME > [WaPo] AN IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL DOESN'T HAVE TO BE PERFECT - JUST BETTER THAN THE ALTERNATIVES.

IMO read, SHORT-OF-WAR???

versus

* TOPIX > [Times of Israel] HOLLANDE: FOR DEAL, IRAN MUST HALT ITS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS.

Dare Hollande be the opposite of POTUS Bammer - HOLLANDE IS A LOUSY GLOBALIST + EU UNIONIST, BUT ONE HELLUVA OUTSTANDING NATIONALIST + PRO-SOVEREIGNTY FRENCHMAN???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-11-17 22:12  

#13  It's raining in Riyadh, they may be quite sincere.
Posted by: newc   2013-11-17 20:04  

#12  Iff the MSM-Net is to be believed, Israel + the KSA have been working on an Iran attack plan for several years now.

As per #10, IMO no matter whether it begins wid JAPAN, PHIL, TAIWAN, INDIA, or even RUSSIA = RFE, it will devol into perhaps China's only opportunity this century to voluntarily/
diplomatically or forcibly all of its "strategic access" issues.

The longer China waits, the more difficult it will become as the US-Allies establish permanent GMD-TMD, + both China's regional allies as well as rivals, + Radical Islam, become MilPol stronger + go full-monty Nukulaar.

* E.G. TOPIX > ABE HAILS JAPAN'S RETURN TO WORLD STAGE.

* INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > JAPAN DEFENSE MINISTRY FOR 60% CUT IN TANKS, COURSE FOR MILITARY REFORM [Tech-led/centered expansion].

* BIG NEWS NETWORK > JAPAN TO TAP TECHNOLOGY FOR MILITARY USE, ANOTHER STEP AWAY FROM PACIFISM.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > INDIA TO HAVE 200 WARSHIPS IN NEXT TEN YEARS, up from 136 tote at present + to include up to three CV's in three separate major MR commands.

VERSUS

* OTOH INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > CHINA TO BUILD SUPER NUCLEAR BOMBER CAPABLE OF CARRYING OF 200 NUCLEAR BOMBS [170-210 qty = bombload] | IDRW.ORG.

[DR. FU MANCHU, NOT-AN-AGENT-OF-SHIELD [or is He?] = "CAPTAIN AMERICA, WINTER SOLDIER" FLYING AIRCRAFT CARRIER here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-11-17 18:59  

#11  ..yes, 'importing' oil from Siberia (or whatever the Chinese end up calling it) is a lot more secure and less costly then building a large blue water navy to protect their oil supply lines(see Japan circa 1941).
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-11-17 18:48  

#10  China talks about how they're going to take back Taiwan. They talk about how they're going to take all of the Philipines' territorial waters. They talk about how unfortunately there's nothing they can do if the Norks go off the reservation (wink wink) against the South.

But I suspect their real Next Planned Shooting War is to take over the Russian Far East once the Iranian Bomb War kicks off.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-11-17 18:35  

#9  this is probably also being coordinated with the French since the existence of Israel-Saudi cooperation gives the French more leverage in getting a non appeasement deal between Iran and the US/EU

I've also wondered where China in this. A nuclear Iran would seem to be very bad for China as it would up the price for oil.
Posted by: lord garth   2013-11-17 17:58  

#8  Report: Obama Refusing To Take Calls From Netanyahu Over Iran...

I guess he'll have to read what happened to Iran in a newspaper.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-11-17 15:00  

#7  Obama's finally found a cause Pat Buchanan can back!
Posted by: Frank G   2013-11-17 14:59  

#6  Report: Obama Refusing To Take Calls From Netanyahu Over IranÂ… <LINK>

...Bloggery origin, including denials, HERE...

Posted by: Uncle Phester   2013-11-17 14:33  

#5  Who cares if it's not true? If we had a CIA worth anything at all we'd be leaking Photoshopped images of Israeli F15s at Dahrain...
Posted by: Steve White   2013-11-17 10:49  

#4  Maybe not true, but, can you think of any other "smart diplomacy" that could even get these sorts of ideas broached?

The Zero regime has plumbed depths of depravity and incompetence unthought of, not to mention reached, in the past.
Posted by: AlanC   2013-11-17 09:45  

#3  I don't think the Saudis can be trusted atm. Not that I trust John 'Marshall Petain' Kerry either.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-11-17 07:29  

#2  You can't always trust what you read. I will believe this when Dan rather gets his old job back.
Posted by: Spereting Tingle4064   2013-11-17 05:16  

#1  Not true, but appealing.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-11-17 02:48  

00:00