You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
US network to scan workers with secret clearances
2014-03-11
[AyPee] U.S. intelligence officials are planning a sweeping system of electronic monitoring that would tap into government, financial, Google, Facebook, Verizon, voter registration roles, and other databases to scan the behavior of many of the 5 million federal employees with secret clearances, current and former officials told The Associated Press.

The system is intended to identify rogue agents, corrupt officials, enemies of the state, and leakers, and draws on a Defense Department model under beta testing development for more than a decade, according to officials and documents reviewed by the AyPee.

Intelligence officials have long wanted a computerized collar system that could continuously monitor employees, in part to prevent cases similar to former National Security Agency analyst Edward Snowden. His disclosures bared secretive U.S. surveillance operations.
Didn't know Eddie was an analyst, I thought he was a SYSAD geek.
An administration review of the government's security clearance process due this month is expected to support continuous monitoring as part of a package of comprehensive changes.
I recommend a network of orbiting drones, initially unarmed.
Posted by:Besoeker

#13  You're the man OS :-) I absolutely enjoy your and Pappy's assessments.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-03-11 22:23  

#12  Well I will admit I do have to do pre-clearance on things until I die (or 25 years). And they have a pretty solid lid-lock on me for the interim. Which was made very clear to me at my last debrief.
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-03-11 22:21  

#11  As per DRUDGE, it apparently included Diane Feinstein's DB + others in the Congress, + Diane is not a happy camper about it.

Nope, she's not happy at all.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-03-11 22:13  

#10   What this tells me is that the SCI "Lifestyle" polygraph is as useless as it is nasty to sit thru.

I've read the Rooskis don't use polygraphs because they consider them unreliable and actively train their people to defeat them.

Just an impression from outside the community, but it seems that while our guys are good at technical stuff - signals intell, photo-recon, etc - they fail badly at stuff involving humans. This leads to embarrassing mistakes like missing the fall of the fUSSR, blowing up a Chinese embassy and various Snowdens.
Posted by: SteveS   2014-03-11 22:04  

#9  Sorry OS, you know you can really never leave. Your PR has been indefinitely extended. You've been administratively indoc'd. Please get a shave, a haircut, and advise us of any pending foreign travel. We'll be in touch. :-(
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-03-11 19:48  

#8  What this tells me is that the SCI "Lifestyle" polygraph is as useless as it is nasty to sit thru. The Aussies have dropped their requirement. The US should too, and spend that money on something like actual counter-intel surveillance.

I am so glad Im debriefed and not actively in the system, and will, (barring an act of God) never be read-in again. Im too old for this sh*t.
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-03-11 17:13  

#7  Sandy Berger!
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2014-03-11 12:20  

#6  Over the past year we've learned more about NSA high-level special intelligence tactics and techniques than we've learned about Champ's college classes. Has to tell you something about priorities does it not ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-03-11 11:50  

#5  As long as they're letting people walk in and out of so called secure facilities with laptops, CDs, thumbdrives, etc. they're gonna have Snowdens, Mannings and, let's see, who was that Clinton associate who stuck the papers up his pant leg? Can't remember the name...
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2014-03-11 11:45  

#4  Remember when the system fails because people short cut or did a run around the system, the answer is to have even more controls and more systems rather than holding people accountable for their management failure to follow the rules and procedures. /sarc off
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-03-11 10:16  

#3  Perhaps a series of 5 log-on questions beginning with.... 'Do you plan to answer truthfully to the following 4 questions'....?
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-03-11 07:25  

#2  Elvis's version is far superior. IMHO
Posted by: RJ45ACP   2014-03-11 03:49  

#1  (Sung to the tune "Please Release Me" by Tom Jones... yeah showing my age)

Pleaeeeeease debrief me, let me go
I don't want the need to knoooooow....
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-03-11 03:39  

00:00