You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Hillary wouldn't name Boko Haram as 'terrorist organization'
2014-05-08
Under Hillary Clinton, the State Department repeatedly declined to fully go after the terror group responsible for kidnapping hundreds of girls.

The State Department under Hillary Clinton fought hard against placing the al Qaeda-linked militant group Boko Haram on its official list of foreign terrorist organizations for two years. And now, lawmakers and former U.S. officials are saying that the decision may have hampered the American government's ability to confront the Nigerian group that shocked the world by abducting hundreds of innocent girls.

In the past week, Clinton, who made protecting women and girls a key pillar of her tenure at the State Department, has been a vocal advocate for the 200 Nigerian girls kidnapped by Boko Haram, the loosely organized group of militants terrorizing northern Nigeria. On Wednesday, Clinton said that the abduction of the girls by Boko Haram was "abominable, it's criminal, it's an act of terrorism and it really merits the fullest response possible, first and foremost from the government of Nigeria."

Clinton said that as Secretary of State she had numerous meetings with Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan and had urged the Nigerian government to do more on counterterrorism.

What Clinton didn't mention was that her own State Department refused to place Boko Haram on the list of foreign terrorist organizations in 2011, after the group bombed the U.N. headquarters in Abuja. The refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen senators and congressmen.

"The one thing she could have done, the one tool she had at her disposal, she didn't use. And nobody can say she wasn't urged to do it. It's gross hypocrisy," said a former senior U.S. official who was involved in the debate. "The FBI, the CIA, and the Justice Department really wanted Boko Haram designated, they wanted the authorities that would provide to go after them, and they voiced that repeatedly to elected officials."
Wonder how fast the Clinton machine will push this down the rabbit hole, and punish any journalist who dares to bring it up?
Posted by:Steve White

#8  I believe those are "thankles".
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2014-05-08 21:57  

#7  "Funny 'Shipman' or whoever you are! Ever try to run serpentine on cankles?"
Posted by: Frank G   2014-05-08 20:02  

#6  Serpentine motion Hill!Serpentine motion!

Posted by: Shipman   2014-05-08 16:00  

#5  Probably because she never had to dodge sniper fire from them...
Posted by: tu3031   2014-05-08 14:30  

#4  Just another aspect in the Liberal de-facto 'War on Women'.

Obviously this isn't as horrible as refusal to provide Sandra Fluke rubbers while she's attending an expensive University.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-05-08 14:24  

#3  Name one success Clinton had as Secretary of State.
Posted by: DarthVader   2014-05-08 14:15  

#2  I wonder if they worked for her in Benghazi?
Posted by: Cleart Scourge of the Geats1995   2014-05-08 12:43  

#1  Difficult to fathom today, but I can recall discussion at ISAF [at about that same time], regarding whether the Haqqani Network was actually a terrorist network. A Haqqani connection was generally dismissed as a legitimate element in personalia development.

Upon reflection, it would appear that an expansion of the terrorist network list to include the Haqqani, failed to support the regime narrative. It did however leave a number of the leadership and many analysts shaking their heads.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-05-08 11:21  

00:00