You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
One traffic-ticket camera kickback scheme hits a red light
2014-05-18
[WASHINGTONTIMES] Rajiv Shah, an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois at reliably Democrat Chicago, aka The Windy City or Mobtown
... home of Al Capone, a succession of Daleys, Barak Obama, and Rahm Emmanuel,...
, examined the raw data a few years ago and discovered that municipal officials had rigged the definition of "collision" to exclude rear-enders. It quickly became obvious when the spying cameras were installed and a lot of motorists began getting unwelcome surprises in the mail that skittish drivers were quick to hit the brakes when a traffic light flashed yellow. That's the sort of unexpected and erratic behavior that causes accidents. When Mr. Shah included "rear-enders" in the calculations, the cameras were shown to yield no statistically significant benefit.

Why then the rush to install the cameras? The criminal complaint newly filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has an answer. For a decade, John Bills was Chicago's deputy transportation chief with oversight over the revenue cameras. According to prosecutors, Mr. Bills quickly realized he could share the ticket wealth with himself.

The indictment paints a vivid portrait of a bureaucrat living it up with parties, trips, luxury hotel suites, a condominium, a Mercedes convertible and even cash for his girlfriend. Redflex Traffic Systems, the Australian company that owns the revenue cameras, used a third party to spread $2 million in bribes to Mr. Bills and his associates.

Prosecutors say they had an insider as a source for the allegation. Aaron Rosenberg, the former executive vice president of Redflex, said in papers filed with the court that he bribed officials in 14 states to get his company's robotic cameras on as many street corners as possible. He wasn't "doing it to save the children," and neither was Chicago.

Mr. Rosenberg signed a pretrial diversion agreement, allowing him to turn state's evidence without fear of prosecution. Such a deal is likely to send quivers and shivers down the spines of every town councilman in Mr. Rosenberg's Rolodex. The song-and-dance routine about "safety" doesn't explain why so many politicians collected campaign donations, meals, trips and other incentives from the revenue-camera makers.

Mr. Bills insists he did nothing wrong. His lawyer says "nobody at Redflex has told the truth." The web of lies spun over the course of two decades is likely to come apart in a Chicago courtroom as more of the growing list of defendants seek leniency in exchange for telling what they know, which is probably plenty. The public deserves to know, too.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Arizona had them everywhere. The Gov, Jan Brewer, had them removed right after she took office. She said they were doing nothing for the safety of Arizonians, that they were a revenue generating ploy and unfair.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2014-05-18 19:37  

#4  San Diego shut theirs down over a year ago
Posted by: Frank G   2014-05-18 17:33  

#3  Lets be clear. Red light/speed cameras are major sources of revenue for city/local government.

"Chicago's first speed cameras at just four locations issued warnings to more than 233,000 speeders in 45 days, violations that would have totaled $13.8 million in tickets"
Posted by: Squinty   2014-05-18 16:30  

#2  AlanC, especially in Chicago of all places!
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2014-05-18 10:56  

#1  I'm shocked that gambling bribery and corruption is happening in a bureaucracy. Shocked I say.
Posted by: AlanC   2014-05-18 08:55  

00:00