You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Southeast Asia
French General: Vietnam should sue China in court
2014-05-26
Former Air Defense General Jean-Vincent Brisset has suggested that Vietnam bring China to the international arbitration court as an effective way of dealing with China's violation of international law.
Beats holing up in an indefensible valley...
VOV: Besides legal action, what else do you think Vietnam should do to resolve the matter?

Brisset: Vietnam should immediately convene a conference of ASEAN countries involved in the territorial dispute [the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and even Indonesia] to reach consensus on reactions to China. ASEAN countries should be aware that a single nation is unable to confront China in the long run.

Vietnam needs to enhance communications overseas, for instance publishing more video clips that show Chinese ships firing water cannons at Vietnamese coast guard and fishing vessels near the rig, to unmask China's provocation.

VOV: As a leading expert on China, how do you view China's strategy in the East Sea following its oil rig placement?

Brisset: This is part of China's long-term strategy aimed at controlling the entire East Sea. They carefully premeditate every step, and their strategy is targeted at related nations, one after another, so that ASEAN cannot produce a strong common reaction altogether.

Regional countries must realise that China is emerging and this trend will continue with stronger actions in the near future. This is the naked truth and the sooner you deal with it, the more you counterbalance the risk.

VOV: Do you think there is a military risk in the region?

Brisset: Not really at the moment. China is aware that a military conflict means the whole world will adopt another stance towards it, and condemn its action. Therefore, China strives to avoid a military conflict over territorial tensions in the Hoang Sa (Paracel) archipelago.

However, there is a high risk of serious collision between the two sides' vessels at sea, and a loss of temper could lead to escalation.
Posted by:Squinty

#7  The latest this AM ...

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS, CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > [VietnamPlus] CHINESE SHIP [fishing vessel?] SINKS VIETNAMESE FISHING VESSEL.

* RELATED DRUDGEREPORT > [Bloomberg] CHINESE SHIP ATTACKS, SINKS VIETNAM FISHING BOAT, VIETNAM SAYS.

And so it begins ...

Beijing = China being PCorrect-Deniable.

No Viet casualties - all Viet sailors seemingly rescued by other Viet boats.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [VOA News = PhoBalsa TV]SOURCE: HANOI NO LONGER CONFRONTING CHINA SHIPS.

IMO read, HOW WILL POTUS BAMMER = USA REACT IFF WORST-CASE = SHOOTING WAR HAPPENS???

Same question a number of PHIL Politicos [Japan? ASEAN?] are asking or wondering.

* VOICE OF RUSSIA > CHINA CALLS VIETNAM'S CLAIMS TO DISPUTED ISLANDS [SCS] "RIDICULOUS".
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-05-26 22:34  

#6  Realistically speaking, even presum that Vietnam, etal. wins its case before the ICC, only the UNSC in which both China, + China's SCO-CSTO BFF + strategic partner Russia, hold formal veto power to [militarily] enforce any ICC decision.

In effect, Vietnam's action [+ PHIL] is more an attempt to empower diplomacy than anything else.

CHINA WILL REMAIN IN THE SCS + ECS UNTIL SUCH TIME CHINA PER SE DECIDES TO UNILATER LEAVE OR GIVE UP ITS CLAIMS, OR IN LATERN A MAJOR WAR BREAKS OUT WHICH CHINA LOSES.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-05-26 19:55  

#5  The so called tu3031 rule, which prevents him from gathering all the SOTDs and putting them under his futon.
Posted by: Shipman   2014-05-26 16:21  

#4  Mods are disqualified from the award.
Posted by: Pappy   2014-05-26 14:39  

#3  Beats holing up in an indefensible valley

So Steve, can you award yourself the Snark of the Day, or are you disqualified from voting?
Posted by: Matt   2014-05-26 10:34  

#2  Two long term action for the East China Sea crowd for future action. One - make quality inspection of products for export to be beyond reproach. Two - organize in the US to promote at the right time a consumer boycott of Chinese made products. When you execute two, show the panicked western capitalist running dogs number one.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-05-26 09:30  

#1  Beats holing up in an indefensible valley...

That comment really is going to leave a terrible mark.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-05-26 09:21  

00:00