You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
ISIS has grown larger than Kuwait army
2014-09-14
I had no idea Kuwait was a standard.
To understand the magnitude of the problem on a global level, and not just on the Syrian and regional fronts, we must be aware of just how significant the CIA's estimation was on the number of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) fighters. Less than two years ago, the CIA estimated their number at just a few hundreds, and a few months ago it estimated their number at 10,000. However, this week it admitted that ISIS forces have in a short period of time tripled to 30,000. Many governments across the world have also confirmed that many of their Muslim citizens have joined the group.

ISIS is now larger than the largest terrorist organization in the world. Its number is double the number of Kuwait's army, and its money, arms and hiding places make it one of the richest states in the region. ISIS fighters also surpass the strength of the world's armies as they possess the will to die. One ISIS fighter is equal to ten soldiers from a regular army. ISIS also includes hundreds of fighters who are willing to perform suicide attacks. ISIS can be a rival of the American army, which is the most trained and equipped in the world. The CIA's estimation of the number of ISIS fighters is most likely based on information from the field, aerial surveillance, interrogating prisoners and gathering information from friendly security apparatuses.

To think that the battle can be completed with aerial intervention or a military campaign in Iraq is a delusion or a simplification of a difficult situation which has grown with time and with negligence. We are confronting a fierce war in Syria and its surrounding countries and it will take us at least two years and probably even double this time to finalize it. All current preparation indicators show that the duration of fighting ISIS will be long especially in Syria. Iraq, as a state and army and considering its capabilities and local alliances, is capable of expelling and defeating ISIS as long as the central government in Baghdad is seriously dealing with the threat of the terrorist organization. However the war on ISIS in Syria is the most difficult on political, social and military levels.

As silence continues over the Syrian regime forces' targeting of 70% of the country's population - who are Sunnis - and as Lebanese Hezbollah militias and Iranian militias continue to fight alongside Bashar al-Assad's forces, ISIS will alter its stance and seek to be embraced by the Sunnis for protection. It will thus gain the sympathy of Sunnis across the world, just like the Taliban which sought refuge in its tribal regions in Afghanistan.

U.S. President Barack Obama's positive step of approving $500 million to train Free Syrian Army fighters to fight ISIS will lay the foundation of relations between the U.S. and the Syrian people. It may be the first step towards a long-awaited decision to support change in Syria. However, we are not counting on the $500 million allocated for training opposition fighters and we are not counting even on the $5 billion to fight ISIS. The $500 million will go to less than 3,000 opposition fighters, which is half the number of Hezbollah fighters fighting in Syria. The opposition army is even smaller when compared to the frightening army of ISIS.

What further complicates the situation is that training 3,000 Syrian opposition fighters is a very slow process that will require two years. Fighting ISIS cannot wait. This will might require drawing more manpower from the lists of thousands of Syrian army defectors who currently reside in refugee camps either inside or outside Syria to join the fight against ISIS as professional soldiers who will help fill the gap. It will also call for reviving efforts to a political solution as perhaps parties in support of Assad now realize its ally has sunk in a swamp and that it is time for a reconciliation government which Assad is not part of.
Posted by:Pappy

#12  our fatalities are 2 orders of magnitude lower.

Very true. Unfortunately, our country's sensitivity to combat deaths, thanks to MSM spin and general lib wussiness, is 4 orders of magnitude higher than theirs. At least.

In fact, they claim to welcome combat death.
Posted by: KBK   2014-09-14 22:03  

#11  Fallujah also demonstrates that when they stand and fight they die by the thousands, and our fatalities are 2 orders of magnitude lower.
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-09-14 21:18  

#10  As per FREEREPUBLIC, ISRAEL says it + IDF will fight the ISIS/ISIL iff Jordan is threatened or attacked by same.

I suspect iff the ISIS strikes KUWAIT first, or even EGYPT + KSA, the IDF will be militarily involved long before Jordan, etc. is finally threatened.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-09-14 20:34  

#9  This assumes our intelligence services are capable of accurately determining the size of the Kuwaiti army.

ISIS has an "army", but how well are they trained?

Somebody made the point that these guys are not some pickup-team off the street but have been fighting some of the best - Marines, IDF, and such. No doubt they would die in large numbers in a head-to-head fight against 1st Marines. Urban combat is another story. Both Fallujah 1 and the recent scuffle in Gaza come to mind.

Magic Eight Ball says: "kill them now, in the open"
Posted by: SteveS   2014-09-14 17:01  

#8  ....but let the 1st Marine Division land at Basra and move north, and watch them either run or die.

Exactly what is needed. We'll use the same ROE and detainee processing regime as the Iraqi Army if you don't mind.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-09-14 14:49  

#7  So much of this is pure bullsh$$. ISIS has an "army", but how well are they trained? Yeah, they may be able to defeat an army with no leadership willing to fight, but let the 1st Marine Division land at Basra and move north, and watch them either run or die. They're just a bunch of murdering thugs. As for the "leadership" of the US, I'll believe in it the first time I see a napalm strike on a line of vehicles, or a squadron of A-10s deployed to Israel.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2014-09-14 14:06  

#6  IIRC the Kuwait army was not in a active full defensive posture when Saddam invaded because (the usual bankrupt rationale) it might 'provoke' him.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-09-14 11:11  

#5  There were still Free Kuwaiti Navy assets fighting.
Posted by: Pappy   2014-09-14 09:51  

#4  How long did the Kuwaiti army last against Saddam Hussein's forces?
Posted by: trailing wife   2014-09-14 08:33  

#3  Props to Kuwait army and soldiers who are brave enough to wear uniforms.
Posted by: Herman Munster   2014-09-14 07:36  

#2  I think my son's primary school is bigger than Kuwaiti army.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2014-09-14 07:15  

#1  And their airforce?
Posted by: borgboy   2014-09-14 05:00  

00:00