| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| White House 'Not Going to Get Ahead' of Motive Investigation in Oklahoma Beheading |
| 2014-09-29 |
| Didn't stop the White House from massive Federal intervention in Ferguson however. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #17 Do we know anything about the victim here besides her name and age? |
| Posted by: Rob06 2014-09-29 23:31 |
| #16 Resetting cookies. New 'puter. |
| Posted by: BrerRabbit 2014-09-29 18:37 |
| #15 ...crock.... |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2014-09-29 18:21 |
| #14 What a cock of S*it! Every time I think I cannot be surprised by what driveling fools and clueless amateurs run this administration, I am shown I set the bar too high..... |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2014-09-29 18:21 |
| #13 The good muslims are the soddies who bribe our politicians. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2014-09-29 14:38 |
| #12 This would go down better if they added 'because we know radical islam was the motive by his comments before and after the attack.' Without that I have to think they are waiting for folks to forget before they double-down on workplace violence. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2014-09-29 14:17 |
| #11 The use of euphemisms to soft peddle horrendous killings by Islamics such as occurred at Ft. Hood (workplace violence), Oklahoma, and even 911 (Bush said it was the bad Muslims who did this) is conterproductive and creates confusion. Napolitano calling terrorism: “man-caused” disasters. The question is "Why?" Beyond the Painfully obvious explanation of just plain stupid, why? JohnQ, can't have the natives getting restless, can we? Might threaten their PhoneyBaloney jobs. Our society now runs completely on euphemism. |
| Posted by: jay-dubya 2014-09-29 12:35 |
| #10 EU6305, but it was white on blak violence. The white guy shot the black guy, who was just practicing his religion. |
| Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2014-09-29 12:25 |
| #9 JQC, the Saudis and their ilk have bought and paid for so many politicians and PC academics I think your reason is right there. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2014-09-29 12:19 |
| #8 Hat tip to the CEO for shooting the bastard. But if it ain't white on black the president doesn't care. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2014-09-29 11:31 |
| #7 The use of euphemisms to soft peddle horrendous killings by Islamics such as occurred at Ft. Hood (workplace violence), Oklahoma, and even 911 (Bush said it was the bad Muslims who did this) is conterproductive and creates confusion. Napolitano calling terrorism: “man-caused” disasters. The question is "Why?" Beyond the Painfully obvious explanation of just plain stupid, why? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2014-09-29 10:41 |
| #6 As was mentioned here yesterday, the elephant in the parlor is the issue of Islamic recruitment in the nation's mosques, prisons, and detention facilities. If you refuse to call it what it actually is [domestic Islamic terrorism], then networking it back to it's origins is entirely unnecessary. No sensing admitting inconvenient truths when denial is still available. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2014-09-29 10:16 |
| #5 BTW, Poor choice of words. (not the title, the spokesbabble's) |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2014-09-29 10:14 |
| #4 "I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played," Obama said Wednesday night while taking questions after a White House news conference. Obama on Henry Gates, 2009 Pre beer-summit. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2014-09-29 09:57 |
| #3 Obumble: Young un, You're the grand bloody panjandrum of painfully bloody prevarication and obfuscation. “See a pin and pick it up, and, all day long, you'll have a pin.” ― Terry Pratchett, Going Postal |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2014-09-29 09:32 |
| #2 Why not? You did with the Fergeson shooting. You did with Bengazi. You did with Treyvon. Or do you not wish to have it be seen as Islamic terrorism no matter what? |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2014-09-29 09:10 |
| #1 The answer might be embarrassing. |
| Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2014-09-29 09:00 |