You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US response to IS recruiting propaganda comes off poorly
2014-10-27
The U.S. State Department is producing anti-Islamic State propaganda to persuade American and other would-be jihadis not to join the extremist group. It’s ham-handed, and often sarcastic, and unlikely to have the intended effect.

Islamic State [IS] propaganda pulls no punches. Beheading videos, boasts about enslaving women, promises of austere Sharia-led lives, it’s all there. You want what it offers? Come along, because IS wants people who make a positive commitment to join.

The State Department’s propaganda uses a negative message to counter the attraction of IS media. The content is seemingly written more to appeal to Washington than potential jihadis. A lot of the messaging mocks potential recruits, claiming, for example, they read “Islam for Dummies” before heading to Syria.

Oddly, State’s and IS’s messaging are not all that different, at least in the topics covered. Both stress that recruits are unlikely to survive fighting. State paints that as a terrible choice, while IS categorizes it as a positive one leading to martyrdom. Both feature photos of Christian churches Islamic State destroyed, with obviously different judgments of the act. Both talk about Western life, with IS emphasizing its spiritual emptiness.

Both sides agree that Muslims are killing Muslims. But the view expressed in State’s messaging is that all Muslims are the same, while IS says some so-called Muslims are not genuine and it is thus not a violation of the Koranic injunction against Muslim-on-Muslim violence to kill them. A core audience agrees; one report says 92 percent of Saudi Sunnis see IS activities as religiously legal.

State’s messaging says IS recruits will die and go to hell. IS messaging says they will die and go to heaven. Both are literally propaganda to die for. Who is winning in that match-up?
Posted by:Anguper Hupomosing9418

#7  Both stress that recruits are unlikely to survive fighting.

When you see the enemy is making a mistake, do not interrupt.
Posted by: gorb   2014-10-27 21:27  

#6  What does pajama boy have to say about IS?
Posted by: Squinty Ghibelline3379   2014-10-27 18:13  

#5  Its the typical beltway snobbery and elitism on display. May as well have the Harvard AV club do the responses, its all the same people.
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-10-27 11:47  

#4  Typical Washington campaign ads. Simplistic, snarky and snide written to impress their, oh so clever, sophisticated peer group.

Nothing about the pros of the alternative, liberty, opportunity, etc. Nope, the State Dept. don't believe in those.
Posted by: AlanC   2014-10-27 08:06  

#3  How about we let our strategic bombers send the message, instead of the Saudi agents at State?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2014-10-27 06:55  

#2  Seen*
Posted by: Snineth Phavimble9212   2014-10-27 04:51  

#1  Isis should be branded devil worshippers and bring out the war posters like the 30 and 40s, put doubt on the fence sitters. I haven't much attempt yet to persuade anyone on any crisis.
Posted by: Snineth Phavimble9212   2014-10-27 04:50  

00:00