You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
US sends planes armed with depleted uranium weapons to Middle East
2014-10-31
[Iran Press TV] The US Air Force says it is not halting its use of depleted uranium weapons, has recently sent them to the Middle East, and is prepared to use them.

A type of airplane, the A-10, deployed this month to the Middle East by the US Air National Guard's 122nd Fighter Wing, is responsible for more Depleted Uranium (DU) contamination than any other platform, according to the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons (ICBUW). "Weight for weight and by number of rounds more 30mm PGU-14B ammo has been used than any other round," said ICBUW coordinator Doug Weir, referring to ammunition used by A-10s, as compared to DU ammunition used by tanks.

Public affairs superintendent Master Sgt. Darin L. Hubble of the 122nd Fighter Wing told me that the A-10s now in the Middle East along with "300 of our finest airmen" have been sent there on a deployment planned for the past two years and have not been assigned to take part in the current fighting in Iraq or Syria, but "that could change at any moment."

The crews will load PGU-14 depleted uranium rounds into their 30mm Gatling cannons and use them as needed, said Hubble. "If the need is to explode something -- for example a tank -- they will be used."

Pentagon front man Mark Wright told me, "There is no prohibition against the use of Depleted Uranium rounds, and the [US military] does make use of them. The use of DU in armor-piercing munitions allows enemy tanks to be more easily destroyed."

On Thursday, several nations, including Iraq, spoke to the United Nations
...boodling on the grand scale...
First Committee, against the use of Depleted Uranium and in support of studying and mitigating the damage in already contaminated areas. A non-binding resolution is expected to be voted on by the Committee this week, urging nations that have used DU to provide information on locations targeted. A number of organizations are delivering a petition to US officials this week urging them not to oppose the resolution.

In 2012 a resolution on DU was supported by 155 nations and opposed by just the UK, US, La Belle France, and Israel. Several nations have banned DU, and in June Iraq proposed a global treaty banning it -- a step also supported by the European and Latin American Parliaments.
Posted by:Fred

#10  You are right OS. Really.
Surgical strikes against military targets are good as an augmentive strategy but direct overwhelming force devastating an entire population is what ends wars and builds nations.
The last [now two(2)] generation(s) and their elected officials don't have the stomach for it.
Posted by: Skidmark   2014-10-31 23:01  

#9  There are too many "banned" weapons now. Why the he$$ aren't we using napalm against ISIS? It works! A few dozen drops and ISIS will be ISFRIED. The idea that any "weapon" should be banned from the arsenal unless it does damage to the second or third generation living where it's been used is a crock and needs to be ignored. Somebody use a clue-by-four on our "leadership".
Posted by: Old Patriot   2014-10-31 21:38  

#8  Beheadings of civilians is banned as well.
Posted by: Airandee   2014-10-31 16:36  

#7  Why not ban IEDs first?
Posted by: Bobby   2014-10-31 14:23  

#6  Several nations have banned DU, and in June Iraq proposed a global treaty banning it - a step also supported by the European and Latin American Parliaments.

That's because none of them have such a weapon.
Posted by: Bobby   2014-10-31 14:22  

#5  Fine, let's carpet bomb ISIS with tac nukes using B-52's. If anyone is alive to complain, the complaint desk is in front of that A-10's cannon over there.

Why is there wires hooked to the number? Pull your ticket and find out.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2014-10-31 13:40  

#4  The piece of paper I put into the hat says, Yes, to Mullah Richard's proposal.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2014-10-31 11:08  

#3  Just one A-10 strike would put the ISIL folks in a world of hurt.

Subsequently, the Kurds would only need a couple big speakers, amplifier and a 30-second sound-bite of a low strafing run to clear out large swaths of the bad guys.

Do that ruse enough, though, and the jihadis might get used to it enough to stupidly hang around for their next actual 'reception' of the 30mm PGU-14B ammo.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2014-10-31 09:59  

#2  Big whoop.

Let me know when we start using UNdepleted uranium weapons.
Posted by: AlanC   2014-10-31 07:22  

#1  more 30mm PGU-14B ammo has been used than any other round
Cause it works.
Posted by: Skidmark   2014-10-31 00:59  

00:00