You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
US should seek non-military options in hostage-takings
2014-12-07
A journalists' group called on the United States Saturday to explore alternatives to military action in dealing with hostage-takings, after an American and a South African were killed in a failed rescue attempt in Yemen. Luke Somers, an American photojournalist, and Pierre Korkie, a teacher, were killed early Saturday in the unsuccessful rescue operation in Yemen's southeastern Shabwa province.
Non-military options have worked so well in the other hostage situations. Just ask all the guys who were beheaded...
Reporters Without Borders said tragic outcomes in hostage-takings by Islamic militants have become more and more frequent, underscoring the growing dangers facing journalists.
Which means that you should roll over and let them take you hostage? And consign your fate to their hands without resistance or possible rescue?
"We again urge the US government, which has announced its intention to review its policy on hostages, to explore all alternatives to the military option and to make every effort to guarantee the safety of the civilians involved," said Christophe Deloire, the secretary-general of Reporters Without Borders.
That's just what we did. We did indeed make every effort to keep the hostages safe. It didn't work because there are no guarantees. Notice how Deloire works this he wants 'guarantees': those can never be given, so no action therefore should ever be taken...
"This review must be conducted on the basis of consultation with former hostages, both US and foreign, with the families, if they so wish, and with the employers and NGOs concerned."
No, we don't need to consult with former hostages, and we certainly don't need to consult with the employers and NGOs -- unless they have useful information. The decision is ours and not theirs. The demand for 'consultation' is a demand for a veto given their opinions as to the use of force.
The charity group Gift of the Givers said it had been negotiating to secure Korkie's release and had expected him to go free as early as Saturday when the rescue operation intervened.
You'd been negotiating how long? And you suddenly thought he'd be released? Where exactly did the turnip truck drop you?
US President Barack Obama said he authorized the operation because of indications that Somers was in imminent danger.

In a video this week, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula threatened to execute Somers within 72 hours.

Somers, who was kidnapped in September 2013, was the third American journalist killed this year in hostage-takings by Islamic extremists. Two US journalists, James Foley and Steven Sotloff, American aid worker Peter Kassig and British aid workers Alan Henning and David Haines were all beheaded in Syria by the ISIS group.
Without a rescue attempt, mind you...
Posted by:Steve White

#11  Here's betting NSA has street addresses and family names in that vast monstrosity of a data base they gather.

Can't be any surprises left.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2014-12-07 17:13  

#10  Damn right ^^^
Posted by: chris   2014-12-07 16:31  

#9  ..if you really want to be effective in that manner, you need to hunt down kidnappers' family members as well. It's a methodology they understand (and practice).
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-12-07 15:36  

#8  At the beginning we should of hung a couple of gitmo inmates at the first ransom note. We had every right to execute non-uniform enemy combatants (still do by the way). Would dropped the frequency of subsequent kidnappings. To be clear the hangings did not have to be real or of living detainees but it would be my preference they were live executions.
Posted by: Airandee   2014-12-07 15:20  

#7  Yep, if one of the minions of the MSM goes in harms way and gets captured or kidnapped for ransom, let the NYT or WaPo pay the ransom.

They knew the risks...or should have.

Personally I don't see the need for DoD to mount a multimillion dollared rescue effort for some scummy MSM water carrier who is probably spending all of their time trying to find some atrocity committed by the US to report.

Fuck em,
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2014-12-07 12:20  

#6  Those Danes gotta be paid.
Posted by: AlanC   2014-12-07 07:32  

#5  Golly me, why have we not thought of this before?

Maybe it makes kidnapping more appealing. That is the number one trade in the world after-all. If you want to make it more lucrative,....

Posted by: newc   2014-12-07 03:05  

#4  No matter what the cost.Ebbomesh. That is how the MSM, and too manyeople feel.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-12-07 01:28  

#3  In other words, pay the ransoms and meet the demands of the cut throats is what MSM is implying.
Posted by: Ebbomosh Hupemp2664   2014-12-07 00:35  

#2  Here's an idea, we will use whatever options we deem necessary for anyone except reporters.

For reporters, they're on their own.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2014-12-07 00:27  

#1  How about not going to places where you end up as hostages and if you freely choose to do so, we just don't give a damn about the consequences you'll face?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-12-07 00:15  

00:00