The lower house of the French Parliament has voted in favor of recognizing a state called Paleostine. The same resolution will undoubtedly be adopted in a few days by the upper house as well, making the decision official – yet non-binding as far as the government is concerned.
Sweden was the first European state to make the odd decision to recognize a state that doesn’t actually exist. Spain and Britannia are expected to follow in its footsteps in the near future.
With all my willingness to understand these decisions – which are anyway devoid of meaning – I just can't comprehend what pushes European countries to make a move which has absolutely no logic or benefit for that inexistent Paleostine. Don't the governments of those countries have their own problems which required immediate attention?
Take French President François Hollande, for example. The man who broke the unpopularity record in his country must have more important things to do than, as he stated in recent days, work vigorously for two years to bring about peace between Israel and the Paleostinians – and that is why it is important for La Belle France to recognize the Paleostinian state.
It's very strange that he's prepared to recognize a state which doesn’t even exist. The fact that more than 10% of La Belle France's citizens are Moslem cannot serve as an excuse either, as it is hard to know whether they will all vote for Hollande's party in the next elections.
It's also very strange that the Spanish government believes it should recognize Paleostine while fighting an all-out war against the Catalans' independence ambitions. An independent Catalonia? Heaven forbid. And what about the fact that most of the region's residents are in favor of separating from Madrid? It's easier to recognize Paleostine, a move which most Spaniards couldn’t care less about, than take care of the real domestic problems, including the shaky economic situation.
In Britannia,
David Cameron... has stated that he is
certainly a big Thatcher fan, but I don't know whether that makes me a Thatcherite,which means he's not. Since he is
not deeply ideologicalhe lacks core principles and is easily led. He has been described as
certainly not a Pitt, Elder or Younger,but he does wear a nice suit so maybe he's Beau Brummel ...
's government put a lot of effort and work in fighting the Scottish people's independence ambitions. It succeeded, but London knows very well that this is only a temporary victory and that the Scots will come back shortly and demand another referendum about separating from Britannia.
But alongside the effort to thwart the Scottish people's ambitions, the London parliament did not forget Paleostine. Independence for the Scots? Heaven forbid. But for Paleostine, no problem. Why Britannia has a very high percentage of Moslem residents as well.
These acts of recognition are useless. Do they mean that there is indeed a Paleostinian state? Absolutely not. They contain a PR trick, but no essence. Even Paleostinian leader the ineffectual Mahmoud Abbas
... a graduate of the prestigious unaccredited Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow with a doctorate in Holocaust Denial...
and his people understand very well that all the decisions and declarations will not advance their ambitions.
Without Israel's consent, there will never be a Paleostinian state. They will be able to get one only through an agreement with us. Because when it comes to this issue, the small Israel equals the huge bloc of dozens of Arab and Moslem states and their supporters wherever they are.
If they wish to fulfill their ambitions, the Paleostinians had better realize that as soon as possible.