You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Israel's only option
2014-12-26
À la guerre comme à la guerre (In war, as in war) – A French maxim

The dispute between the Arabs and Jews is an “agrarian dispute,” over the question of who puts who in the ground first – Attributed to Yisrael Galili (1911-1986), head of National Staff of the Hagana, and an iconic figure in the Labor Party

Over the last two decades, Israel has inexorably painted itself into a perilous corner. By blunder after debacle, it has allowed itself to be corralled into a political cul-de-sac that threatens to undermine its very ability to survive as the nation-state of the Jewish people.

...There is an increasingly ominous sense that Israel is powerless to contend with the threat of Palestinian unilateralism, and at a loss as to how to counter Palestinian diplomatic offensives – or rebuff the maelstrom of international censure should it dare to do so.

...However, despite the undisputed gravity of the situation, despair need not be warranted – if the Israeli leadership can find the necessary intellectual integrity, moral courage and political foresight.
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#3  Unfortunately for the Paleos, Egypt believes wholeheartedly in "Egypt for Egyptians" + that includes their territory of the Sinai.

Ditto for the KSA, Hashemite Jordan + Assadian Syria despite their commonality wid Islam.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-12-26 21:35  

#2  Oh I support statehood for those areas because it
a) would be an embarrasign feckup.
b) would enable all sorts of retaliation
c) others who rather like Isreal getting the attention would have to step in instead.

in short, let incompetent people get the independence and responsibility they deserve.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2014-12-26 18:37  

#1  This is a brilliant article. I'd highly recommend reading the whole thing. His proposed policy solution is the first one I've heard that actually sounds like it could work.

The most pressing measure is to make it clear to the Palestinians – and to their supporters – that if it is independence they demand, then independent they will have to be.

Thus, Israel must convey unequivocally that it will cease, forthwith, to provide every service and all merchandise that it provides them today. In other words, no water, electricity, fuel, postal services, communications, port facilities, tax collection or remittances will be supplied by Israel.

This will vividly expose the futility of the Palestinians’ endeavor for statehood, which almost two decades after the Oslo accords and massive investment has not produced anything but an untenable, divided entity crippled by corruption and cronyism, with a dysfunctional polity, an illegitimate president, an unelected prime minister, and a feeble economy that, with its minuscule private sector and bloated public one, is unsustainable without the largesse of its alleged “oppressor.”

Humanitarian response to ‘humanitarian crisis’

There is little doubt that such a unilateral initiative by Israel would inflict considerable hardship on large sectors of the Palestinian population – engendering inevitable accusations that it is precipitating a “humanitarian crisis.”

To counter these charges Israel must provide a “humanitarian response” and offer individual nonbelligerent Palestinian breadwinners generous relocation grants to help them build a better life for themselves and their families elsewhere, free of the incompetence and corruption of the cruel cliques that have led them astray for decades.


The only thing I'm disappointed in is that he doesn't make concrete places for the relocation. Egypt would be an obvious possibility, since Sisi has already offered, but psychologically, I'd say that funding relocations to such places as Norway, Sweden, Britain, Belgium, Germany, and France would be the most useful, politically/public relations wise. The Palestinians would line up to relocate, of course. And those countries would either have to put up or shut up, either admit thousands (millions) of Palestinians, or to admit their blatant hypocrisy on the whole issue.
Posted by: DLR   2014-12-26 14:51  

00:00