| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Hillary’s Webb of Paranoia |
| 2015-01-01 |
| Geraghty asks more questions than he answers. I would argue that a Hillary presidency would be Nixon's 3rd term, because the left always becomes the things they profess to hate: Presidential candidates usually get better the second time around — experience helps them avoid the same mistakes, they are more prepared for the challenges of the campaign trail, and so on. Mitt Romney clearly was a better candidate in 2012 than in 2008. John McCain was better in 2008 than in 2000. But what if Hillary isn’t going to be any better than in 2008? What if she and her closest advisers are getting worse? Hillary’s book tour from this summer offers some evidence of this — she declared she and Bill Clinton were “dead broke” when they left the White House, got static for her position on gay marriage, and had her first public fight with the Obama White House. She continues to make extremely lucrative speeches, including some at public universities, despite the bad publicity. More at the link |
| Posted by:badanov |
| #3 As one of the last orders of business for a losing campaign, they recorded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet the names and deeds of members of Congress. There's an error in judgement. Your telling me an organization like that lacks the resources and expertise to administer an Oracle database on Linux platform? Or are they just trying to keep Gates on board? |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2015-01-01 13:32 |
| #2 More like Slick Willy's 3rd term Keep in mind that Bill had enough sense to tack just enough to the political center to defuse things when it was needed. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2015-01-01 13:13 |
| #1 Hillary tries to pick off her most credible enemies prior to election. Paranoid? I don't think so, it is just what the left does. Nixon's 3rd term? More like Slick Willy's 3rd term. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2015-01-01 11:13 |