You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Did Swedes Just Decide for National Suicide?
2015-01-02
Unsigned editorial in Shabelle News of all places...
Woe to anyone in Sweden who dissents from the orthodox view that welcoming large numbers of indigent peoples from such countries as Iraq, Syria, and Somalia is anything but a fine and noble idea. Even to argue that permitting about 1 percent of the existing population to emigrate annually from an alien civilization renders one politically, socially, and even legally beyond the pale. (I know a journalist threatened with arrest for mild dissent on this issue.) Stating that there exists a Swedish culture worth preserving meets with puzzlement.

And yet, the realities of immigration are apparent for all to see: welfare dependency, violent bigotry against Christians and Jews, and a wide range of social pathologies from unemployment to politically motivated rape. Accordingly, ever-increasing numbers of Swedes find themselves — despite known hazards — opting out of the consensus and worrying about their country’s cultural suicide.

The taboo on such attitudes means that political parties, with only one exception, staunchly support continued immigration. Only the Sweden Democrats (SD) offer an alternative: real efforts to integrate existing immigrants and a 90 percent decrease in future immigration. Despite an unsavory neo-fascist past (not something unique to it, by the way), SD has become increasingly respectable and has been rewarded with electoral success, doubling its parliamentary vote from 3 percent in 2006, to 6 percent in 2010, to 13 percent in 2014. All the Swedes with whom I spoke on a recent visit expect the SD vote to grow further, something recent polls confirm.

If a party or bloc of parties held a large majority in Sweden’s unicameral parliament, SD would be virtually irrelevant. But the Riksdag’s two blocs are almost equally balanced. Three left-wing parties control 159 of 349 seats, while the “right wing” (quotation marks to denote that, from an American perspective, it’s hardly conservative) Alliance for Sweden, consisting of four parties, has 141 seats. This means that SD, with 49 seats, holds the balance of power.

But SD is deemed anathema, so no party bargains with it to pass legislation, not even indirectly through the media. Both Left and “Right” seek to isolate and discredit it. Nevertheless, SD has played kingmaker on certain crucial legislation, particularly the annual budget. In keeping with its policy to drive from power every government that refuses to reduce immigration, it brought down an Alliance for Sweden government in early 2014. Recent weeks saw a repeat of this scenario, when SD joined the Alliance in opposing the leftist budget, forcing the government to call for elections in March 2015.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Socialism and political correctness.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-01-02 14:41  

#8  When did the tough Sweden of the past disappear?

Socialism will do that to anybody.
Posted by: gorb   2015-01-02 14:11  

#7  Multiculturalism can work as long as ALL the cultures are reciprocal.
When tribals are imported (to presumably boost the rents establishment types exist on) it harms the country.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2015-01-02 12:42  

#6  When did the tough Sweden of the past disappear?

It's all Ruskies' fault.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-01-02 11:56  

#5  Vikings conquered and settled in good chunks of Ireland, England, Normandy, Iceland, etc, leaving the less violent at home.

Vikings converted to Christianity around 1200 and lost the remains of that viking spirit. They might still have remained an awesome western military but pretty much the aggressiveness was bled out by then.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-01-02 11:08  

#4  When did the tough Sweden of the past disappear?

I remember reading about the Swedish army being a major concern for the Russia of the Czars. Was it when they decided to appease the Germans and be neutral in WWII? Was it the neutrality/fear of Russia in WWI?

What happened to the Vikings?
Posted by: AlanC   2015-01-02 09:27  

#3  I guess the Swedes have not noticed their culture going to hell lately. Multicultural at work while completely ignoring that some cultures do not play well with other cultures.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-01-02 09:18  

#2  Time to take out the family Skeggöx.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-01-02 03:03  

#1  And yet, the realities of immigration are apparent for all to see: welfare dependency, violent bigotry against Christians and Jews, and a wide range of social pathologies from unemployment to politically motivated rape. Accordingly, ever-increasing numbers of Swedes find themselves — despite known hazards — opting out of the consensus and worrying about their country’s cultural suicide.

When the Swedes begin to rigorously endorse Affirmative Action and inclusion, so-called 'social pathologies' will be begin to be seen as normative. You can temporarily escape by moving away to the suburbs or sending your children to private schools, but the suicide of the host culture is the desired outcome of multi-culturalism.
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-01-02 02:12  

00:00