You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Democrats unveil 'new' strategy to tax the wealthy
2015-01-13
[HOTAIR] If you thought the Democrats recently chased into the minority were going to sit by quietly while the GOP put all the proposals on the table, think again. Their agenda to fix America (at least in terms understood by your dog and your veterinarian) will still be on the table. The rallying cry of income inequality isnt going anywhere, and Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) is ready to lay out the next plan in what the Washington Post laughably calls a stark shift in messaging for 2015.

Okay, boys lets see what youve got.
Senior Democrats, dissatisfied with the partys tepid prescriptions for combating income inequality, are drafting an action plan that calls for a massive transfer of wealth from the super-rich and Wall Street traders to the heart of the middle class.

The centerpiece of the proposal, set to be unveiled Monday by Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), is a paycheck bonus credit that would shave $2,000 a year off the tax bills of couples earning less than $200,000. Other provisions would nearly triple the tax credit for child care and reward people who save at least $500 a year.

The windfall about $1.2 trillion over a decade would come directly from the pockets of Wall Street high rollers through a new fee on financial transactions, and from the top 1 percent of earners, who would lose billions of dollars in lucrative tax breaks.
So youre cooking up a populist plan to use the tax code to target the most wealthy and successful Americans and hand out the money to everyone else. Perhaps I missed part of the story, but exactly how does this work out as a stark shift in Democrat messaging?
The challenge is a big one. You have to think big, you have to think forward, and you have to think new. You have to think new and fresh, House Minority Leader Nancy San Fran Nan Pelosi
Congresswoman-for-Life from the San Francisco Bay Area, born into a family of professional politicians. Formerly Speaker of the House, but it's not her fault they lost. Really. Noted for her heavily botoxed grimace...
(D-Calif.) said in an interview, endorsing Van Hollens proposal. Van Hollen said that he has briefed senior administration officials and that they were receptive.
For some reason the Washington Post is apparently going to allow both Pelosi and Van Hollen to describe this as fresh new thinking with a straight face, while failing to even note that this is the same playbook the Democrats have been working out of for most of our lifetimes. But they do at least acknowledge the one serious fly in the ointment; the GOP now controls which bills make it out of committee for a vote, and this plan is never even going to make its way out of the closet.
When the Dhimmicrats propose taxing Tom Steyer a full 25% of his current wealth give me a call. Until then they (and the Pubs) are hypocrites...
Posted by:Fred

#6  At least it's not just tax 'em and spend it. It's a different slant on progressive rates, benefiting the middle class. Is this a refundable credit?
Posted by: KBK   2015-01-13 21:13  

#5  Even the wealthy are starting to worry about wealth inequality, they just dont want to pay for it themselves. It has reached historic levels and is usually a harbinger of bad events.
I'm not saying we should pillage the rich and hand it to the Free Shit Army, but we are heading headlong towards social unrest and the issue of stagnant wages vs. skyrocketing wealth of the top .1% to top 5% is a serious issue.
Posted by: bigjim-CA   2015-01-13 18:58  

#4  Hoe about "Theft".
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2015-01-13 18:16  

#3  It appears to be a change in that in the past they wanted to steal from the rich and give to the poor but somehow the rich got richer and the middle class got crushed.

Now they want to rob from the rich and give to the middle class. Good luck with that. Without closing loopholes strategies for socking to the rich are just hot-air.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-01-13 15:08  

#2  The rich will simply move their excess funds -- and by definition it's pretty much all excess -- into the new sweet spot minimizing taxation while maximizing return on investment and security. They can afford the expensive accountants, lawyers, and financial advisors, and will make those changes quickly. The result, as France recently discovered, will be lowered tax receipts rather than the expected windfall... And possibly a permanent loss of those citizens, as France's current government is now fervently hoping not to discover.
Posted by: trailing wife   2015-01-13 11:03  

#1  Perhaps we could call it...... "insurance."
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-01-13 01:18  

00:00