You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
President Obama confirms that illegal immigrants who qualify for his programs won't be deported regardless of judge's order
2015-02-26
[DAILYMAIL.CO.UK]
  • 'If you’ve been here for a long time and if you qualify, generally... even with legal uncertainty, they should be in a good place,' Obama said

  • POTUS was participating in a town hall hosted by Telemundo and MSNBC and led by an anchor affiliated with both networks, Jose Diaz-Balart

  • ICE Officials who don't abide by his directives are 'going to be answerable to the head of the Department of Homeland Security,' the president said

  • Obama again promised to reject legislation under consideration by the the Republican-led House and Senate undoing his actions

  • 'I will veto that vote, because I’m absolutely confident that what we’re doing is the right thing to do,' he said to rancorous applause.
Posted by:Fred

#7  AFAIK the US Constitution does NOT recognize Partial, Semi-, or Quasi-US Citizens + Permanent Residents - ITS EITHER THEY ARE, OR THEY ARE NOT.

EITHER DEPORT THEM ASAP, EN MASSE' IFF NEED BE, OR ELSE STOP P ******** WUSSYING AROUND + MAKE THEM DE FACTO CITIZENS-RESIDENTS.

WHY? BECAUSE THE FEDS ARE BREAKING CONSTITUTIONAL + FEDERAL LAWS IFF THEY DON'T, WHICH THEY ARE NOT TO BE DOING.

Many Years or Decades of Pervasive or Perennial PCorrectness-Deniabilty has affected the Fed so much I won't be surprised iff they don't know the difference between right or wrong, up versus down, etc. anymore.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-02-26 22:21  

#6  And the RINOs are perfectly fine with this tyrant.
Posted by: Airandee   2015-02-26 22:18  

#5  Contempt is a disregard or disobedience of public authority. As
applied to injunctions, criminal contempt is wilful disobedience of the
courts' decree, thus resulting in a disregard for the courts' authority.
Criminal contempt in the federal courts has to some extent been limited.
both substantively and procedurally, by statute; but for the most part,
the common law rules still prevail.' Formulation of general rules determining
the evidentiary requirements for criminal contempt is difficult
because the violation is defined largely by the terms of the specific injunction.
For example, a guard accused of mishandling a federal prisoner
in a county jail could not be convicted of criminal contempt because this
conduct was not embodied in a decree.8 But where there was a court
order committing a prisoner into the custody of a sheriff to be held safe
until the expiration of his sentence, his conduct in allowing a prisoner to
go free was criminal contempt.' Thus it is seen that an injunction is
analogous to a criminal statute. Conduct not forbidden cannot be criminal
contempt. But, like statutes, injunctions frequently must be phrased
in general terms to be effective and therefore require subsequent judicial
interpretation to ascertain what they prohibit."

http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2810&context=ilj
Posted by: Ebbomosh Hupemp2664   2015-02-26 16:41  

#4  Getting better all the time: Obama Dares GOP: Go Ahead, ‘Have a Vote on Whether What I’m Doing Is Legal…I Will Veto’

I fear that he will plunk some whack-o's magic twanger and things will get really ugly.
Posted by: Spereling Hupeling6103   2015-02-26 16:11  

#3  rancorous applause

That word does not mean what you think it does.
Posted by: KBK   2015-02-26 13:46  

#2  He's a tyrant (well, a puppet tyrant), but an elected one. He does have that in common with Hitler. Often people wish to be subjects.
Posted by: Glenmore   2015-02-26 13:08  

#1  He doesn't give a shit about even pretending to follow the law anymore. The tyrant is out in the open.
Posted by: DarthVader   2015-02-26 12:36  

00:00