You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
U.S. won't back Syrian rebels against Assad
2015-03-12
[ARA] The U.S. Secretary of Defence, Ash Carter, said Wednesday that the American administration is not sure about its legal authority to provide protection to the trained Syrian rebels from attacks by local military forces affiliated with Syrian Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad
Leveler of Latakia...
According to Carter, a Congressional approval of new war powers in Syria would not necessarily guarantee backing Syrian moderate rebels against Syrian regime's forces in the ongoing war.

"We don't foresee that happening any time soon," he said.

Carter reportedly said during a Senate hearing that no final decision has been made yet in this regard.

"A legal determination has not been made, whether we would have authority to do that or not," The U.S. Defence Secretary said.

The United States launched a training program aimed at preparing about 5000 Syrian moderate rebels to combat Death Eater fighters of the Islamic State
...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allah around with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not really Moslems....
through ground operations in Syria.

However,
facts are stubborn; statistics are more pliable...
the American strategy in this regard was exposed to a wide range of critique as it doesn't take into consideration the threat of pro-Assad forces to the trained rebels.
Posted by:Fred

#1  According to Carter, a Congressional approval of new war powers in Syria would not necessarily guarantee backing Syrian moderate rebels against Syrian regime's forces in the ongoing war.

Of course it wouldn't. The point is to provide cover for the administration when it all goes awry, and Congress as the future scapegoat.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-03-12 17:20  

00:00