| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Obama warned not to take Iran deal to UN instead of Congress |
| 2015-03-13 |
| [IsraelTimes] Senator Bob Corker says submitting agreement to Security Council and not Congress would be 'affront to American people' US Senator Bob Corker warned President Barack Obama Republicans can come along for the ride, but they've got to sit in the back... Thursday against a reported plan to take a nuclear deal for approval to the United Nations |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #18 #15 Lets ask Bob Menendez. #16 don't you mean compromises? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-03-13 19:52 |
| #17 Even if being a traitor is simply not standing up to the blackmail. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2015-03-13 19:48 |
| #16 Paul and I have discussed this for awhile. The FBI/IRS/NSA data comprises the lot of them. Traitors all. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2015-03-13 19:47 |
| #15 I my humble unbacked-up-by-facts opinion, O had Justice and FBI dig up a bushel of dirt stored in a basket on each and every congress critter, ready to dump out in public if any of them gets too frisky in opposing O&Co's agenda. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2015-03-13 18:53 |
| #14 I'm sure France wants a nuclear armed Iran within missile distance. /sarc off |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2015-03-13 18:04 |
| #13 Or what?? What will Congress do? Boener will cry on national TV? McConnell will bitch and moan then add some pork to it and approve it? They wont do crap, Our congress is full of cowards.. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2015-03-13 14:59 |
| #12 I look forward to the treaty being shot down by Congress and then correcting leftests for the next two decades when they claim the US isn't following the treaty. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2015-03-13 14:56 |
| #11 Powerline Blog - US law trumps any International Law "NOTHING in international law can alter U.S. law, except to the extent it is made part of U.S. law, by virtue of being lawfully adopted as a treaty or U.S. statute. The president may make “executive agreement” deals with foreign nations, and these may have some status as international law, but they only possess the U.S. law status of a presidential deal — they are not part of the binding “Law of the Land” for the USA. Nothing in international law — not made part of U.S. domestic law — can prevail over US federal law. An international law determination — by whatever body — cannot trump the U.S. Constitution, a U.S. statute, or a U.S. treaty. " |
| Posted by: Frank G 2015-03-13 10:33 |
| #10 ...were his father and mother, grandparents, and buddy and ghost writer Bill Ayers commies? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2015-03-13 09:48 |
| #9 The UN Security Council has permanent member nations China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and the United States. Non-permanent members include Angola, Malaysia, New Zealand, Spain, and Venezuela. Under our present regime, would the U.S. vote with Russia, China, and Venezuela? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2015-03-13 08:11 |
| #8 Well it won't be binding and will mean as much as the Kyoto treaty did. For MM, Darth |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-03-13 06:11 |
| #7 D *** NG IT, clearly only an archaic, 20th Century, Wears-a-Bow-Tie-Like-Orville-N-Paul-Simon NATIONALIST would NOT take the deal to the OWG GLOBALIST UNO??? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2015-03-13 02:05 |
| #6 Well it won't be binding and will mean as much as the Kyoto treaty did. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2015-03-13 01:21 |
| #5 The first six years Obama played the part of an American campaigner in chief. Now the last two years he intends to leave the pre-recorded teleprompter speeches behind and embark on satisfying his deep anti-American tendencies. |
| Posted by: Ebbomosh Hupemp2664 2015-03-13 01:16 |
| #4 What disturbs me even more than this Iran deal is that America voted for this band of grifters - twice. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2015-03-13 01:06 |
| #3 Should have never been in office to be impeached in the first place. |
| Posted by: chris 2015-03-13 00:55 |
| #2 I was wrong AGAIN. Articles of Impeachment should have been brought against him from the beginning. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2015-03-13 00:27 |
| #1 Me thinks there is more to this agreement than they are willing to admit. I bet there are some real doozies in the fine print. I wonder if the agreement includes gun and ammo control, solar energy, a bail out of the Iranian automobile industry and a "reform" of the Iranian health care system? |
| Posted by: Mystic 2015-03-13 00:20 |