You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The inside story of how the US let Iran reach the nuclear weapons threshold
2015-03-14
[BusinessInsider] In speaking with nearly 30 experts and veterans of both the Bush and Obama administrations, I've found one core factor at the heart of this outcome: the desire to avoid military engagement with Iran at all costs -- and, particularly during the Obama administration, the fear of even threatening it.

Without a credible threat to use force, the United States has relied on tools that alone could never have compelled the Islamic Republic of Iran to abandon its nuclear program.

Convinced that the United States would not attack, Iran has largely dictated the terms. The history of negotiating with Iran suggests that no matter the result of the next round of diplomacy -- full agreement, another extension, or collapse -- the Iran talks have failed.
There's a cute little map at the link that will be of absolutely no use to you if you are even slightly colourblind, dear Reader. But if you aren't, it's quite informative.
Posted by:Hupineger Glomomp52169

#8  Artist's Impression Of Obama "Refusing To Engage With Dangerous Lunatics"


Posted by: Hupineger Glomomp52169    2015-03-14 21:00  

#7  130 centrifuges in 2003 and 20,000 in Nov. of 2013. Damn, I'd say that's successful negotiations (sarc).
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-03-14 12:01  

#6  Therefore the "first".
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-03-14 11:23  

#5  ..you still had a institutional State Department that would rather fail than represent America's own self interest.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-03-14 10:12  

#4  First, you remove Iran's only natural enemy---the Iraqi Baathist regime.
Second you elect a community organizer---who thinks he's a genius, to be your chief executive.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-03-14 09:32  

#3  Obama has said that Iran could become a “very successful regional power” in the wake of a deal —a statement he made after he told the New Yorker that if Iran began operating “in a responsible fashion,” it could underpin an “equilibrium” with Sunni Gulf states “in which there’s competition, perhaps suspicion, but not active or proxy warfare.”

This is precisely where the Champ is coming from. His strategy has absolutely nothing to do with alleged [barking dog] Bush or any previous administration's failures found herein. Great piece, thank Hup.
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-03-14 08:33  

#2  As per #1, Yuuup.

Once again, the OWG Globalists - in this case US-specific Globalists - have N-O-T answered the question regarding what does Amerika get in return for putting their own country in DE FACTO high existential danger or risk???

EVEN IFF I GUESS IT 100% OR 1.OMILYUHN PERCENT CORRECTLY, I STILL WANT TO HEAR IT FROM THEIR LIPS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-03-14 01:41  

#1  Obama
Posted by: chris   2015-03-14 00:24  

00:00