Submit your comments on this article |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Iran's deal should be subject to UN approval: Source |
2015-03-19 |
[Iran Press TV] A final deal between Iran and the P5+1 group of countries on Iran's nuclear program should be endorsed under the Chapter VII of the United Nations ...an organization conceived in the belief that we're just one big happy world, with the sort of results you'd expect from such nonsense... Charter, a source close to the talks between the two sides says. According to the source on Wednesday, if Iran and its opposite sides in the negotiations want to strike a binding comprehensive accord, they should try to obtain the required approval from the United Nations, so that the terms of the agreement could not be violated in the future. The unidentified source said putting the deal under a UN oversight and have it approved by a UN Security Council resolution is the "main request of the Islamic Theocratic Republicof Iran from its negotiating sides." He added that such a move by the Security Council would also guarantee the removal of the unfair sanctions which were imposed on Iran under the terms of Chapter VII of the UN Charter. "A resolution [by the Security Council] under Chapter VII will naturally be a part of the comprehensive solution," he said, adding that if the final deal is not adopted as a UNSC resolution, "it would be useless and would fail to change the system set up by previous Chapter VII resolutions." The official denied that Iran's insistence on the issue had anything to do with a recent letter by some Republican senators, who tried to sabotage a potential deal on Tehran's nuclear activities. |
Posted by:Fred |
#2 He can go to the U.N. all he wants but we (the U.S.) will not be legally bound to it. Not that our RINO congress will do anything to stop any implementation. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2015-03-19 10:13 |
#1 No. We should never cede our sovereignty to the U.N. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2015-03-19 08:33 |