You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
US warship heads to Yemeni waters; could block Iran weapons
2015-04-20
The U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt is steaming toward the waters off Yemen to beef up security and join other American ships that are prepared to intercept any Iranian vessels carrying weapons to the Houthi rebels fighting in Yemen.

Navy officials said Monday that the Roosevelt was moving through the Arabian Sea. The U.S. Navy has been beefing up its presence in the Gulf of Aden and the southern Arabian Sea amid reports that a convoy of about eight Iranian ships is heading toward Yemen and possibly carrying arms for the Houthis. Navy officials said there are about nine U.S. warships in the region, including cruisers and destroyers carrying teams that can board and search other vessels.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the ship movement on the record.

The Houthis are battling government-backed fighters in an effort to take control of the country. The U.S. has been providing logistical and intelligence support to Saudi Arabia-led coalition launching airstrikes against the Houthis. That air campaign is now in its fourth week.

The U.S. Navy generally conducts consensual boardings of ships when needed, including to combat piracy around Africa and the region. So far, however, U.S. naval personnel have not boarded any Iranian vessels since the Yemen conflict began.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest would not comment specifically on any Navy movements in Yemeni waters, but said the U.S. has concerns about Iran's "continued support for the Houthis.

"We have seen evidence that the Iranians are supplying weapons and other armed support to the Houthis in Yemen. That support will only contribute to greater violence in that country. These are exactly the kind of destabilizing activities that we have in mind when we raise concerns about Iran's destabilizing activities in the Middle East."

He said "the Iranians are acutely aware of our concerns for their continued support of the Houthis by sending them large shipments of weapons."
Posted by:gorb

#9  How bout just minding our buisness and letting the saudis, egyptians or whomever take care of the shit an stay out of it.
Bout time to return to isolationism.
Posted by: chris   2015-04-20 22:24  

#8  Iff Shia Iran is intended by the Bammer + aligned OWG Globlalists to be the US' Co-Superpower sibling in the ME + Gulf, then IMO the Bammer = USA cannot allow Iran to be stopped as per expanding its "sphere of influence" vee the US or US-Allies in the region, NOR can it be seriously damaged or destroyed ala US-led military action.

DITO AS PER PUTIN-LED RUSSIA + RISING CHINA IN EAST ASIA-PACIFIC.

The US = POTUS Obama is caught in a Geopol-MilPol "quandary", as mainstream Amers can generally or broadly understand + respect wanting overseas Allies to assume more of the security burden for their particular regions, BUT NOT AT THE PRICE OF US NATIONAL-GEOPOL SECURITY, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES/ENDOWMENTS, + ULTIMATELY OUR NATIONAL IDENTITY + EXISTENCE, + WIDOUT FORMALLY ASKING THE PEOPLE OR VOTERS IFF THEY WANT IT.

Once again, the Anti-US OWG Globies have still NOT answered the question as to how much is "too much", andor how far is "too far", etc, for the post-Cold War/9-11 "Sole" Superpower USA to unilaterally give up or fall back across the World so that Russia, China, + Iran, Other? can rise to mighty "US-stye" OWG Co-Superpowerhood, + WIDOUT THE UNILATERALLY OR SELF-RETREATING USA BEING EXISTENTIALLY THREATENED BY SAME + WANNABE NATIONS-STATES + NGOS.

E.G. WORLD NEWS > [UT San Diego] US ADMIRAL WARNS OF CHINESE WATERWAY [waterways = maritime trade route(s)] CONTROL.

* SAME > CHINESE ACTIVITIES THEATEN PHILIPINE DEFENSE - AFP CHIEF.

* RELATED MANILA TIMES > STOP [SCS = China] RCLAMATIONS - AFP.

* BIGNEWSNETWORK > BEIJING SHOCKS US WID UNBELIEVABLE PROGRESS OF AIRSTRIP [construction[ IN SOUTH CHINA SEA.

* MANILA TIMES > EDITORIAL: OPENLY AGGRESSIVE CHINA KNOWS IT CAN ACT WID IMPUNITY.

* SAME > REALITY CHECK IN SOUTH CHINA SEA.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [SMH.com] INDIA STILL NO RIVAL TO CHINA SUPERPOWERS
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-04-20 21:58  

#7  More this AM ...

* RELATED BIGNEWSNETWORK > REPORT: US SHIPS HEADING TOWARD POSSIBLE CONFLICT WID IRAN IN YEMEN.

* LUCIANNE > [Times of Israel] IRAN LEADER [Supreme Ayatollah Khameini] DERIDES "SILLY" US THREATS [poten military action], BUT URGES HIS MILITARY TO BE "PREPARED".

Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-04-20 21:37  

#6  Some one will soon be backing down. Who will it be ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-04-20 21:26  

#5  Given the irresolute nature of the CinC (by that, I mean pro-Iranian ValJar, not the jug-eared idiot that fills the chair), this will not end well.

Either that, or a US commander will have to choose the nation's best interests and sacrifice his career in order to act correctly.
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-04-20 20:51  

#4  As per FREEREPUBLIC Artic, the USDOD = Pentagon says the ships are merely "repositioning".

In any case, CNN AM = IRAN says it will not heed any demand or call by the USN for its ships to stop for weapons check.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-04-20 20:48  

#3  Will they be allowed to do anything or will they need ValJar's Obama's personal approval?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-04-20 20:06  

#2  How do you know they are not there to escort?
Posted by: P2Kontheroad   2015-04-20 19:23  

#1  What's gonna happen to that framework for an agreement if our navy has to sink an Iranian ship?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-04-20 18:39  

00:00