| Submit your comments on this article |
| Europe |
| Spengler: Muslims, Europeans and Boiled Frogs |
| 2015-05-08 |
| Today's New York Times editorial on the Garland, Texas affair protests a bit too much. One might expect liberal journalists to express solidarity with their murdered colleagues at Charlie Hebdo. Instead, the Times offers outright condemnation: Some of those who draw cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad may earnestly believe that they are striking a blow for freedom of expression, though it is hard to see how that goal is advanced by inflicting deliberate anguish on millions of devout Muslims who have nothing to do with terrorism. As for the Garland event, to pretend that it was motivated by anything other than hate is simply hogwash. Not to quibble, but a cartoon contest in Garland, Texas, like the 2005 Mohammed caricatures in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten and the 2014 Charlie Hebdo depictions, only reached a large Muslim audience because Muslim organizations chose to make an issue of images that appeared in obscure publications with a small circulation. The cartoonists did not cause the anguish of millions of Muslims: Muslim authorities of various sorts elicited the anguish of their constituents by denouncing them. If Muslim leaders had ignored the cartoons, the millions of devout Muslims cited by the New York Times would have gone about their daily lives suffering anguish from another source: the cruel and inevitable encroachment of modernity on traditional life. Islam is fragile, far more fragile than the traditional Catholicism which flourished in Italy, Spain, Ireland and Quebec only two generations ago and now is in shambles. We know this because the number of live births to Muslim women is falling faster than in any documented case in the history of the world. Fertility and faith are inextricably linked; academic literature on the theme is deep and persuasive (I reviewed it in my book How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too). As Mary Eberstadt argued in her 2013 book How the West Really Lost God (which I reviewed here), sterile societies lose their desire to bring children into the world before they admit that they have lost their faith. Europe had two centuries in which to adapt to the great wave of secularization, and the old adage about how to boil a frog comes to mind: drop a frog into hot water and it will leap out of the pot, but a frog left in cold water that is slowly heated will not notice that it is being boiled. The Europeans suffered the latter fate, although traditional society in some cases raged against its end, for example Spain's Civil War. Europe had the advantage of two centuries of wealth creation, an explosion of scientific knowledge, social mobility and modern governance; Islam has the disadvantages of two centuries of economic stagnation, isolation from the scientific revolutions, the prevalence of tribal society and governance that is as cruel as it is corrupt. Modernity crept up on the Europeans, but has hit most of the Muslim world with the suddenness of a boiling bath. ...Muslim anguish will deepen, whether or not anyone publishes nasty cartoons about Mohammed (which I do not do, because I do not like vulgar insults against anyone's religion--although I will defend to the death the right to do so). Liberals will agonize along with them. The millions of devout Muslims mentioned by the Times deserve a modicum of sympathy, for life has dealt them a losing hand. The liberals on the other hand provide a fine opportunity for Schadenfreude. Unless, of course---between them, Muzzies & Tranzies manage to bring the Caliphate on our heads. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #3 Does anyone think these two 'noble savages' of Islam would not have eventually struck elsewhere, and possibly with greater success and higher casualties ? Geller and the Garland PD did society a favour. The investigative, social network spin-off may be very beneficial as well. Be thankful for it, be very thankful. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2015-05-08 10:35 |
| #2 But it is equally clear that the Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest in Garland, Tex., was not really about free speech. It was an exercise in bigotry and hatred posing as a blow for freedom. Has the NYTs forgotten the images of falling burning towers in NY, people jumping from the buildings, the attack on the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. This is to say nothing of all the other terrorism and murder committed in the name of the Prophet and Islam over the past half century. I don't have a problem with Geller stirring the pot occasionally. The politicos in D.C. seem to work hard at denying that a problem exists. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2015-05-08 08:47 |
| #1 I'm going to meet Spengler later this month. There a couple of things I would like to ask him. This column is now number one. Why does he think that European's adapted easily over 2 centuries? Those weren't real smooth and easy from what I was taught. Why were the Muslims so slow to catch on? After they were removed from Spain and the Gates of Vienna they were pretty much on a downward spiral. They saw their own demise and that of Europe's many major conflagrations why didn't they learn? |
| Posted by: AlanC 2015-05-08 08:32 |