You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
State Dept Gets Federal Judge to Reopen Hillary Email Case
2015-05-11
[Breitbart] Monday on Fox News Channel's "America's Newsroom w/Bill Hemmer-Martha MacCallum," Fox News contributor and former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano explained Reggie B. Walton, a federal judge on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, has reopened a Freedom of Information Act 2012 case due to a joint request by the State Department and Judicial Watch which both agreed in their request that the fact Clinton kept her State Department email during her tenure as Secretary of State on a private server blocked valid requests.

Napolitano said, "The federal judge said not only will I reopen the case, I will look into whether or not these emails she was supposed to keep were intentionally destroyed or not. So now Mrs. Clinton, in a lawsuit that she is not party, is confronted with State Department lawyers who used to work for her, who were embarrassed when they made misrepresentations to the judge, and Judicial Watch lawyers, who now have the tiger by the tail, now on the same side."
If everyone could just join me now in a collective yawn.

Wash Times link, same story.
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  Hopefully this is moving toward a tipping point - one which Obama will jump onto to "save his legacy" at the expense of Hildabeeste going under the bus with prejudice. And being backed over again just to be sure.
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-05-11 22:41  

#3  There are probably a number of admin people that realize that Clinton is toxic and are abandoning ship to save their own rotten hides.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2015-05-11 19:43  

#2  State must smell blood in the water amd are manuvering to be on the good side of the next administration.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2015-05-11 19:39  

#1  "BJ" Clinton says "there's not a shred of evidence." So far the Clintons have eluded everything. If I were a betting man, I'd guess they will avoid this also--not that I'm not hopeful there will a good airing of things. In my guts, I believe the Clinton Foundation was just a money laundering operation--a quid pro quo operation too. What's provable is another thing and they, being lawyers, know that too.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-05-11 17:27  

00:00