| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| House Debates Recruiting Illegal Aliens Ahead of Americans for Military |
| 2015-05-14 |
| On Tuesday, the Breitbart News team on Capitol Hill brought to light Congress's efforts to allow illegal aliens to enlist in the U.S. military, endangering national security and shoving American citizens to the back of the line for the benefit of invaders. Today, the House Rules Committee will continue to debate this proposition. Live updates are below. UPDATE, by Edwin Mora, 5:13 PM: Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) says it's "ludicrous we're using AUMF's (Authorization for Use of Military Force) from 2001 to justify" Obama's conflicts on immigration and amnesty. UPDATE, by Edwin Mora, 4:51 PM: Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-AL) asked: "Why are we talking about immigration when we're dealing with a defense bill?" He went on to echo other GOP lawmakers who commented on the Gallego amendment, saying the it "has nothing to do with defense." The Gallego amendment "will jeopardize the entire bill," he concluded. UPDATE, by Edwin Mora, 4:42 PM: Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) to Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) I disagree with your argument that "we lack enough Americans and lawful immigrants to meet" our military needs, adding that the "we are here to help U.S. citizens and lawful immigrants." UPDATE, by Alex Swoyer, 4:39 PM: Rep. Polis (D-CO) defended Gallego amendment: "This is really a job creator in the private sector." Brooks disagreed. "There's also a distinction about the quality of jobs," he said. The two Congressmen are arguing about whether the Gallego amendment would open up jobs in the private sector as illegals leave those positions, to join the military for citizenship under the Gallego amendment provision. UPDATE, by Edwin Mora, 4:37 PM: Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA) expressed support for the amendment proposed by his colleague Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) to strike the Gallego amnesty amendment in the 2016 NDAA, saying the "immigration issue doesn't really belong" in the NDAA. The amnesty amendment does not benefit the military, he added. UPDATE, by Matthew Boyle, 4:36 PM: Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX), a member of the House Rules Committee, said there "is nothing about the Gallego amendment that helps the military" adding that the NDAA is not the "place" for immigration to be debated. "The amendment does not belong in the bill in the first place," Burgess said. Chairman Sessions added that he's heard views from lots of members on this. Democratic Rep. James McGovern (D-MA) defended the amnesty amendment contained within NDAA from Gallego, saying it passed through regular order. Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) a liberal Democrat from Colorado, is also defending it with the argument of "military readiness" arguing that somehow illegal aliens may be better than Americans serving in the military. "We need to have the very best men and women" serving in the military. He also argued incredulously that this would create jobs in the private sector. UPDATE, by Alex Swoyer, 4:32 PM: Rep. Sessions says this issue must be debated. Rep. Burgess said, "There is nothing of the Gallego amendment that helps the military. The amendment does not belong in this bill in the first place." UPDATE, by Matthew Boyle, 4:27 PM: Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA) is now testifying in favor of the Brooks amendment. Brat won his election in 2014 thanks in large part to now former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor backing the exact same policy -- amnesty for DREAMers in the NDAA -- and Brat said that the defense bill should not be the place for immigration matters. UPDATE, by Alex Swoyer, 3:53 PM: According to Politico Florida Playbook's Marc Caputo on Wednesday morning, Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL) --a Republican--is pushing harder for even more amnesty in the NDAA than what Democratic Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) 0% got in there. Curbelo is specifically pushing for an amendment from Rep. Jeff Denham (R-CA), the so-called ENLIST Act, into the bill. "Curbelo's one of a handful of Republicans still pushing for immigration reform. He hopes that the House Rules committee, perhaps at its meeting today, greenlights an effort to allow a vote on whether to amend Rep. Jeff Denham's Enlist Act onto the National Defense Authorization Act," Caputo wrote on Wednesday." |
| Posted by:Ebbomosh Hupemp2664 |
| #8 Cannon fodder + like DarthVader said. |
| Posted by: Blossom Unains5562 2015-05-14 19:26 |
| #7 Part of Obama's "Fundamental Transformation" is an abdication of national sovereignty. Go ask native Americans how that worked out for their late ancestors. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2015-05-14 14:54 |
| #6 Soviets did the same in Chechoslovakia during the Prauge Spring, as I recollect. |
| Posted by: Sgt. D. T. 2015-05-14 14:52 |
| #5 Because illegals are cheaper? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2015-05-14 13:47 |
| #4 If we're downsizing why is this even being discussed? /rhet question |
| Posted by: P2Kontheroad 2015-05-14 07:52 |
| #3 If I was a little more paranoid and cynical I would bring up the precedents of Chinese making sure that troops come from far away when they're going to put down the protesters (see Tien a Mien square). I think the Romans did similar and so forth and so on. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2015-05-14 07:37 |
| #2 They want troops who follow illegal orders. American boys and girls won't do that. Therefore they must import them. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2015-05-14 00:42 |
| #1 Just more new evidencia amongst many others that, thanks to many years or decades of allowing illegals to collect US Fed-State public benefits, etc. that by the decisions or actions of the US Govt. itself these illegals are now in reality Quasi- or US-Citizens-in-being, iff not in fact, + THAT ITS ACTUALLY THE FED GOVT. THAT IS MORE BREAKING THE LAW THAN NOT BY N-O-T GIVING THESE ILLEGALS FULL-FLEDGED CITIZENSHIP-N-RESIDENCY, ANDOR BY DEPORTING THEM FROM THE US BACK TO THEIR COUNTRY(S) OF ORIGIN. OOOOOOOPPPPSSSSIES. All thingys have a day or reckonin', and that day is seemingly here for the USoAmerika as per illegal aliens. True to form, the DemoLeft is bitching-n-complaining mightily about the sea changes to US Society wrought by the very thing they themselves did much to create. I could say I told 'em so but I won't. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2015-05-14 00:26 |