| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Could the Next First Lady Be Chelsea Clinton? |
| 2015-05-15 |
| The Clinton campaign is doing its level best to scuttle any mention of Bill Clinton, and to keep his as far away from the campaign trail as possible. But while Bill might be taking a backseat (do I take the ridiculous joke that's just hanging out there about "paradise by the dashboard light?") to his wife and to her advisors, it seems the campaign is looking to another member of the family to take up the reins of the stereotypical "campaign spouse." According to professional Clinton-watchers, Nice profession you got there. It's a living. A comfortable living, especially if you report it just right... Chelsea Clinton, not Bill Clinton is actually the frontrunner among Clintonites to be the First Lady. Owing to tense, I'll bet she doesn't attend any tours of the Blue Room. |
| Posted by:Blossom Unains5562 |
| #6 Frank G, the post of first lady doesn't require a resume other than marriage to the President. I think the Clinton's would need to change a few laws to make that happen. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2015-05-15 15:17 |
| #5 she's never done anything in her life to justify anything she's received other than being born to superior Grifters |
| Posted by: Frank G 2015-05-15 14:30 |
| #4 Massive fail on our part, Ship. But if she is going to be Princess Chelsea, can I be Marie of Romania? |
| Posted by: SteveS 2015-05-15 14:15 |
| #3 You all laughed at my stillborn campaign several years ago to raise enough cash to convince young Chelsea to Tie Her Tubes For Me And You. I got jack nothing from youz. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2015-05-15 13:56 |
| #2 the campaign is looking to another member of the family to take up the reins of the stereotypical "campaign spouse. Sounds !ncestuous. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2015-05-15 09:29 |
| #1 What's wrong with Huma? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-05-15 00:22 |