"The money was paid as fees for speeches by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Foundation officials said the funds were tallied internally as "revenue" rather than donations, which is why they had not been included in the public listings of its contributors published as part of the 2008 agreement."
The mis-allocation of the funds received is kind of interesting. I'm sure that "donations" received by the Foundation must go specifically and entirely for "good works." "Revenues," otoh, are probably a "commission-triggering" event with "part" of the proceeds going to the "revenue" generator (think "Juice.").
It would be interesting to see how the interfamily percentages break out. RICO anyone? Nah, didn't think so. |