You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Can Hillary Clinton crumble?
2015-05-27
[NEWSDAY] Martin O'Malley
...former Democratic governor of Maryland and aspiring presidential candidate, known locally as The One-Man Economic Wrecking Crew. O'Malley was elected to his second term driven by union support and near-Stalinesque vote margins in Baltimore city (82%) and Prince George's County (88%)...
has good abs. And wasn't he was once mayor of Baltimore?
Also governor of Maryland, the man who imposed the rain tax, whose hand-picked successor went under in the last election not so much to a Publican as to "anybody but O'Malley's hand-picked successor."
That seems to be about the sum of what most Americans know about the former Maryland governor as he prepares to launch a presidential bid on May 30.
He's hoping that's all they ever find out about him.
O'Malley polls somewhere between zero and 2 percent in early Democratic primary surveys, a dozen points behind Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who's not even running.
As people learn more about him that should be where he stays.
But O'Malley is suddenly interesting, far more so than his anemic poll numbers would typically warrant. He matters because he's the sole candidate in the current Democratic field who could legitimately step in as the party's standard-bearer should Hillary Clinton's candidacy collapse. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (12 percent in the latest Economist survey) is an avowed socialist, which, thankfully, still makes him a non-starter in American politics. Vice President Joe Biden (11 percent), who is reportedly hanging around in the wings in case Clinton tanks, remains America's favorite crazy uncle. He's a hoot at Thanksgiving, but you don't want to see him behind the wheel.
O'Malley's the epitome if the Feelingsâ„¢-talkin' Taxocrat. No matter how tired you become, do not let him hold your wallet.
O'Malley comes out of central casting.
He's counting on that. Being a pretty boy gets him the same bloc that went for John Edwards.
He's handsome, articulate and passionate about his beliefs.
How can he be "articulate" when he's burying his recent past? Though I guess it does take something like articulateness to evade so many crucial questions.
He stands decidedly to Clinton's political left,
Somewhere between Kamenev and Zinov'ev...
but he has the clean-cut looks of someone who wouldn't spook the American public in a general election.
A Prell user, if I'm to judge...
Not many of those nowadays.
Indeed, when he's not posing shirtless for cameras in beach photo-ops, he looks like the Brooks Brothers conservative Aaron Sorkin might conjure for a new HBO series. And at 52, O'Malley is vibrant. He appears to be reaching his prime, whereas Clinton, rightly or wrongly, seems to have exceeded hers.
She has "Sell by November, 2008" tattooed on her left thigh...
It's not so much that her past is wearing on her, it's that it's catching up with her.
Whereas O'Malley thinks he can outrun his...
It's a marvel to watch Clinton at present. It's as if she's suspended in air. She's the prohibitive favorite to be the Democratic nominee while carrying at least 1,000 pounds of baggage, with more seemingly being added by the day. The big question is whether she can continue to defy gravity. It's possible she can. But it's probable that she eventually falls to earth.
Crash. Burn. No survivors. No insurance.
Posted by:Fred

#11  I am on the fund raising only as presidential candidate..but:

How much will her vice-president nomination go for?

She already has a bit of dementia; the presser the other day she looked loaded on something like add eral. Another night of hitting the Jack and falling down would make VP lucrative.

We are going through an administration which seems to work as little as possible except on fundraising and social issues, two things The Clinton Machine also does. With minimum effort and average propaganda she could look like a real workhorse in comparison. Get her legacy, retire after a couple years, and VP winning future elections could get 10 years in office.

Big Money! Big Prizes! Wheee!
Posted by: swksvolFF   2015-05-27 19:37  

#10   (c) they know she can be bought.

Well yeah, thats pretty much anyone in DC these days. Question for the Bankers Brokers Donors and Soros: will she stay bought?
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-05-27 17:42  

#9  I think the Democrat doners wants Hillary because (a) they don't care about scandals or believe that its all right-wing made up stuff (b) they remember the great economy under Clinton and think that somehow she'll recreate that (c) they know she can be bought.

The run-of-the-mill Democrats are wary of rocking the boat because they hope to get some of that doner money and voters if she backs out.

The media simply reflexively defends her because she's a Democrat and lying to the people to cover for the Democrats is in media DNA.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-05-27 17:08  

#8  Hillary was never going to be the nominee. This is all side show. It delays our scrutinizing the 'fresh face' who will be nominated. We get to waste all our attention and oppo research on a red herring.
Posted by: Iblis   2015-05-27 15:38  

#7  Obama appointed Hillary to the head of the State Department. Her activities were never called into question by Obama.

Obama needs oversight now.
Posted by: Ebbomosh Hupemp2664   2015-05-27 14:48  

#6  How well is that gonna play with Joe Six-Pack?

About as well as Obama's paling around with a pair of Domestic Terrorists and his Marxist roots and upbringings and his sealed records, and his many failures.

The media will simply ignore it. And anyone who even mentions it will be tarred as a racist / sexist / or some other 'birther' type label.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-05-27 14:45  

#5  Is Warren out or is she just waiting. If they dump Hillary and Warren isn't ready all that DEM spending on the war on women propoganda goes to waste.

And really, O'Malley? Baltimore isn't really a place to brag about and I've read things that indciate a lot of the problem stem from policying policies that began under his administration. How well is that gonna play with Joe Six-Pack?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-05-27 14:38  

#4  Don't count your chickens before they hatch Deacon - we could be getting setup for a Democratic 'Savior' to come riding over the hill to save us from the EVVVVil Republicans. That may be Fauxcahontas, Creepy Uncle Biden, or O'Malley, or even the Whookie-with-bare-shoulders (for 8 more years of The LightBringer!).
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-05-27 13:38  

#3  With Lizzie Bordon, I mean Warren out and Bernie "How can you have 23 different types of deodorant when children are starving" Sanders the only other candidate it seems the Demo just might be doomed. I can hope, can't i?
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2015-05-27 12:02  

#2  Why would she crumble? We have a national press that's even more willing and able to cover for her than was Tass, Pravda and Isvetya for General Secretary Chernenko in the Soviet Union.

(For those of you unaware of history, Chernenko was basically a walking corpse when he took over for Andropov: COPD, CHF, kidney failure, and possibly end stage chronic liver disease. Yet the Soviet press never let on, until he "died suddently" barely a year after taking office).
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-05-27 10:59  

#1  A Prell user, if I'm to judge...

Shades of John Edwards, the Breck boy?
Posted by: Beldar Forkbeard9429   2015-05-27 08:22  

00:00