You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Former FBI agents say Taliban 5 released for Bergdahl want REVENGE
2015-05-31
[Right Scoop] Time flies when you're an extremist terrorist who has been released from Guantanamo Bay because Obama wanted to claim a victory by bringing accused deserter Bergdahl home. It's been a year since the five top terrorists were released to Qatar, and the no-fly restriction is about to be lifted.

Here's reaction from two former FBI agents:
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  I'm beginning to wonder if "Leading From Behind" has alternate meanings.
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562   2015-05-31 22:46  

#10  Meanwhile, Michelle Rodriguez + Black Widow + SAN ANDREAS Fans, NOT to be outdone by CUBA + GITMO ...

* BIGNEWSNETWORK > [New York Post] CHINA IS GAMBLING OBAMA DOESN'T HAVE THE WILL TO RESPOND TO ITS MASSIVE LAND GRAB [South China Sea].

Again, IMO as an Anti-American Amerikan = Anti-US US OWG Globalist, POTUS Obama is following a pre-determined/established National-Geopol agenda where the US itself is the proverbial tip-of-the-spear in setting up Anti-US OWG-NWO.

And where the Bammer's actions weirdly-n-mysteriously does not qualify as either HIGH TREASON NOR WORTH IMPEACHMENT BY OUR MIGHTY UNITARIAN CONGRESS.

THE PRIORITY OR FOCII IS MARXIST-COMMIE-GLOBALIST US, WORLD SOCIALIST ORDER, N-O-T US-SPECIFIC NATIONAL SECURITY - THE MORE ANARCHY-N-CHAOS INCLUD ISLAMIST-LED JIHAD THE BETTER.


* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > THE SHOCKING REASON AMERICA CAN'T [Can't = Won't?] STOP CHINA IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA.

* SAME > US TAKES A PASS FOR NOW IN SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTE | TIME.COM.

CHINA may had already won in the SCS???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-05-31 22:38  

#9  ...Fox News says as of a few minutes ago that they ain't going anyplace for a little while longer.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2015-05-31 19:29  

#8  or mistresses misters in McLean and elsewhere.

..fixed it fer ya..
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2015-05-31 17:49  

#7  You may remember the Taliban video footage of the Bergdahl release

I surmised that both sides were prepared to 'play' each other at varying degrees for the benefit of their respective audiences. That said, it's more likely that the theatrics, much like the welfare of the exchangee, were secondary to whatever the administration hoped to achieve.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-05-31 14:59  

#6  
Posted by:    2015-05-31 11:53  

#5  The regime's flawed logic is inescapable; points for emptying GITMO, extra point for POW release and media distraction....epic fail all around.

I surmise there was a likely 'overseas' component to this as well, possibly a "player to be named later," or some sort of information exchange in the Klingon/striped-pants manner.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-05-31 11:42  

#4  he's all about the Legacyâ„¢ so much that he's creating one that he deserves. Worst.President.Ever

*spit*
Posted by: Frank G   2015-05-31 09:37  

#3  
Posted by:    2015-05-31 08:21  

#2  these guys should never have been released for a deserter
Posted by: paul   2015-05-31 08:17  

#1  
Posted by:    2015-05-31 07:32  

00:00