| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| In Iraq, Coordination With Iran Not Impossible, Gen. Dempsey Says |
| 2015-07-01 |
| [KALW Radio] Originally published on September 3, 2014 1:26 pm Yes, Sept 4th of last year. Impossible to un-say things already said, the challenge is finding them. In an interview with All Things Considered, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declined to rule out coordination with Iran and Iranian-backed forces in Iraq. Dempsey also told NPR that one option in Iraq might involve U.S. air assets going after "high-value" individuals within the main Sunni insurgent group. "One of the things we need to find out is whether Iran is embedded in and advising and supporting the Iraqi security forces," Dempsey said. "It is really about understanding facts on the ground before we make a decision on how to address them." "We will look at Iran with a cold eye on where and when we may need to operate in the same space and toward what is potentially the same goal of countering" the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS. "But I can state with some assurance that their goals in Iraq are not going to be completely aligned with ours, and we're very clear about that," he told NPR's Melissa Block. "I'm not predicting that it's entirely impossible that we would at any point act collaboratively with Iran," he said. "But there's a long way to go between here and there, in my judgment." Dempsey's remarks were more nuanced than an earlier statement from the White House that seemed to rule out any possibility of coordination with Iran, which has long backed Shiite militias inside Iraq. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 16, press secretary Josh Earnest said: "Any conversation with the Iranian regime will not include military coordination." The original statement is dated Sept 2014. Dempsey reportedly made a similar statement last week (which I have been unable to locate). My comment the other day regarding Iran as a "regional U.S. proxy" [Posted article - Iran 'has the upper hand' in final round of nuclear talks Ex-CIA chief] is based in part on the Dempsey statements. As you may recall, Dempsey also recently stated that the "U.S. has no strategy regarding ISIS" ...or ISIS Iraqi city conquests. This parallels the recent Obama statement of a "strategy under development" etc, etc. Please forgive the clumsy paraphrasing. Yes, of course they have a strategy. Only a fool would fail in this regard. But how can they openly discuss it without looking the greater fool? I would wager there are two parallel dialogues underway between Iran and the U.S. One involves the fiction or cover of restricting Iranian nuclear capabilities, the other, a regional strategy which facilities Iranian regional hegemony. Just my unvarnished assessment, tin foil hat firmly in hand. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #6 I agree. In Dempsey's defense however, it must be difficult for him to read traffic, attend briefings, ceremonies, and keep up with the Obama foreign policy weegie board. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2015-07-01 18:37 |
| #5 General Dempsey's statement is rather at odds with Mr. Obama's recent and very public snub of Prime Minister Al-Abadi, no? |
| Posted by: Pappy 2015-07-01 18:32 |
| #4 Read it twice. Lingering vanilla aftertaste persists. National Military Strategy, June 2015 |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2015-07-01 14:33 |
| #3 U.S. Comments on Iranian Presence in Iraq Dempsey said Iran has been "interested in and sought to influence the future of Iraq since Iraq's sovereignty was restored in 2004." However, the top U.S. military leader said, the Iranian presence and any Iraq partnership with Iran is not troubling at the moment, since it is not threatening U.S. forces or the U.S. mission in Iraq. "If it is a path that ties the two countries more closely together economically or even politically, as long as the Iraqi government remains committed to inclusivity of all the various groups inside the country, then I think Iranian influence will be positive," he said. Link to the above DoD Jan 2015 news release. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2015-07-01 14:17 |
| #2 I suspect that it's already happening. There has been a long-standing, tacit "professional understanding" between US and Iranian military (not IGRC) forces. WRT the IRGC, let's just say there have been "spirited disagreement." The game-changer is that the IRGC is the Iranian force in Iraq/Syria that will be/is coordinated with. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2015-07-01 12:28 |
| #1 I guess it will require President Hillary Clinton and her Muslim Brotherhood agent of influence, Huma Abedin, to formulate a coherent anti-Iran strategy. The current white House occupant, the Iran born Valerie Jarrett, isn't doing so hot. |
| Posted by: Whonter Darling of the Bunions4601 2015-07-01 02:02 |