#13 See also CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > [The Diplomat] NO MORE EASY VICTORIES US MILITARY. AMEIRCA'S ENEMIES HAVE GONE TO SCHOOL [done their homework] AND ARE DEVELOPING COUNTER-STRATEGIES TO CHALLENGE ITS [USA's] MILITAY SUPREMACY | THE END OF THE AMERICAN WAY OF WAR.
DeputySecDef Robert Work in speech to RAND CORP.
DEPSECDEF ROBERT WORK = argued that SPACE is now very much new + legit "dimension of war" + "competition" between the US + Russia-China.
* CHINA DAILY, TOPIX > CHINA CONCERNED OVER [2015]US MILITARY STRATEGY REPORT.
ARTIC > Among other, REPORT = denotes that CHINA [still?] WANTS THE US OUT OF THE WESTERN PACIFIC.
VERSUS
* BIGNEWSNETWORK > [Global Times] CAN THE US, CHINA SHARE POWER IN ASIA.
The answer could "make-or-break" childhood warnings from my Ancestors = 1960-1970's Guam Taotamonas as per the retreating USA sinking Guam + other Pacific Isles as part of strategic denial [so-called "A2/AD"] to China or even Nuclear Islam, but espec agz China.
[WORLD NEWS BLOG = ALMOST-GUAM'S-CAMEL-ROCK SCS PIC here].
WHEN OWG GLOBALIST-DESIRED "CO-SUPERPOWER" PARITY + "HARMONY/STABILITY", ETC. ISN'T ANYMORE.
INSTEAD OF "WORLD PEACE" + EFFECTIVE CREDIBLE OWG-NWO, THE UNILATERALLY OR SELF-RETREATING USA BECAME THE "SICK MAN" OF THE WEST???
* TOPIX > CHINESE GENERALS URGE PLA TO EXPAND NAVY AS WAR RISKS RISE.
* RELATED SAME > SOUTH CHINA SEA IS NOW A "CORE INTEREST" OF BEIJING'S, AND THATS A PROBLEM FOR ITS NEIGHBORS.
* BHARAT RAKSHAK > INDIAN OCEAN CANNOT BE THE BACKYARD OF INDIA: CHINA - PTI, INDIAN EXPRESS.
Lest there be risk of Sino-Indian, Other Inter-Regional Nations' MILITARY CLASHES.
* WORLD NEWS > [Yahoo News] NO INTENTION TO SURROUND INDIA WID "STRING OF PEARLS" BASES: CHINA.
Prolly because iff China's strategy is successful, most or all of China's MilBases in the IOR will be LAND/COASTAL-BASED [vee Pro-China Allies = NAM], whereas most or all of any "Pearls" will be in East Asia-WESTPAC + SE Asia. |
The U.S. national security space community is implementing its 2011 strategy for protecting space capabilities as a result of the perceived increase in threat posed by the development of counterspace capabilities among potential adversaries.