You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Harper Lee's new book portrays Atticus Finch as racist
2015-07-14
[CNNPHILIPPINES] The book is not even out, and readers are already rebelling.

Harper Lee's Go Set a Watchman hits stores Tuesday (July 14), 55 years after To Kill a Mockingbird. The book is hotly anticipated but not without controversy.

It purportedly recasts Atticus Finch, the moral center of Harper's first book, as racist.

Hearts broke across Twitter.

Lee completed Go Set a Watchman in the 1950s. The manuscript was rediscovered last year.

It picks up the story of Jean Louise "Scout" Finch, the young girl who narrates her adventures in a small Alabama town in Mockingbird.

Mockingbird was published in 1960, won the Pulitzer Prize and sold more than 40 million copies. But now, some fans are saying they might not even read Lee's new book because of the racist revelation. They say ignorance can be bliss.
The snowflakes won't read it?
"Readers will do as they wish," filmmaker Mary Murphy, who recently spent time with the reclusive Lee, told CNN.
That's a polite way of saying the snowflakes can go have sex with themselves.
She offered a potentially more nuanced view of Watchman.

"Let's remember that Alabama was a state that would have rather closed its public schools than integrate them. This is the climate in which this book appears," Murphy said. "And a truly liberated white Southern man wasn't something you'd find in these small towns, or across the state. So, Atticus, in the book, reflects -- sort of -- the time, and reflects the culture of the time."

Some fans agree. Heroes are complicated, they say, and life is not about easy -- or necessarily agreeable -- answers.
It sounds like the author maybe drew her hero as a human being instead of a statue of probity cast in cheese.
Posted by:Fred

#8  I use the spelling "racis" to mock the overuse & PC-ness of the original word.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418    2015-07-14 21:43  

#7  I'm surprised the Rape Culture Crowd isn't attacking Atticus because he defended a man accused (falsely) of rape.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2015-07-14 10:08  

#6  These snowflakes can't comprehend that Lydon Johnson was a racist in their southern stereotype model, but also the man who could get Congress, with a lot of Trunk support, to pass the '64 Civil Rights and Voting Rights legislation. The Left can not fathom the ability to put raw human animal emotion and lust for power behind cold reason and principles.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-07-14 10:04  

#5  doesn't can't happen in their neighborhood.


FIFY Bill
Posted by: AlanC   2015-07-14 09:21  

#4  First of all what do they mean by 'racist'? The term is so overused that my left sock could be called 'racist'.

This might be just a publicity stunt
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-07-14 08:42  

#3  Maybe definition of racism changed in the last 50 years. These things always go up and down. I remember, in 1990es I was a racist (and a fascist)---Israeli style, for saying out loud that peace with Arabs is impossible.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-07-14 03:47  

#2  At least pay her for this book seeing as she never got paid for that one.

Mind crime plagues liberals and they force it on Everyone. All that fake guilt.

Liberals are the fascists that made all this happen from the start, remember.
And Faulkners' "The Sound and the fury" should be recommended reading if only to break their timid little soul less hearts about their own party.

Many people are bigots. I know I AM.
I find Islam oppressive,

but do not wake up the liberal fascists until they are being beaten down by moslems yet. That is the future plan of the devil.

No worries, if ya slipped that far, maybe it really is the end.
Nothing left to protect. No civilization, not GOD, no Virtue, not morals, no Commandments.

Just a bunch of "democrat" communist fascists and islamic fucktards beating it out for another thousand years.

I will go back to my perch. No need for me here.
Posted by: newc   2015-07-14 02:28  

#1  Well if he was a racist, then his defense of the black man in "To Kill a Mockingbird" is even more powerful as a story of a man putting ethics and the law above his personal feelings or bias.

Great stuff!!!

I loved Atticus Finch and he was a real man.

The snowflakes can't get it through their heads the concept of a man putting the truth and what is right ahead of personal conviction...doesn't happen in their neighborhood.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2015-07-14 00:38  

00:00