| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Land of the Free |
| California judge rules campus sexual assault kangaroo court 'unfair' |
| 2015-07-14 |
| Posted by:DarthVader |
| #6 Chased instead of chaste. Cute! |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2015-07-14 21:48 |
| #5 She, simpering, scratching a louse: "I'm Emma. I'm meek as a mouse! I may mate in haste But am ever so chased As I bonk everything in the house. |
| Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2015-07-14 14:48 |
| #4 Given that a couple of New York federal judges went the other way in similar cases, we're going to see enough conflicting case law that eventually the USSC will have to take a look. I fear the outcome. For me it's easy: Congress and the Executive branch can't use "administrative hearings" and procedures to circumvent constitutional guarantees regarding counsel, right to confront witnesses, and examine evidence in an adversarial hearing in which there is an accuser and a defendant. Particularly true if there are penalties attached to the defendant, and even more true if the hearing is guided by a letter issued by a Federal bureaucracy with a desired outcome. |
| Posted by: Steve White 2015-07-14 14:47 |
| #3 Columbia Lion Sulkowicz Mumped, "My fundamental bits, Maybe buggered by some German, Dumped a moving year-long sermon." And you should see my new CD player! |
| Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2015-07-14 14:46 |
| #2 Some of these extra-judicial campus courts seem to me a bit like Sharia courts. Criminal behavior should be the province of the criminal courts not the PC kangaroo courts. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2015-07-14 11:56 |
| #1 It isn't designed to be. You are male, therefore you are guilty. Glad to see at least one judge in California still has a small bit of legal sense. Well... until they are torn down by the twitter mob and run from the state in shame. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2015-07-14 09:47 |