You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Stalling Completed - Historic Iranian Agreement!
2015-07-14
Well, at least the stalling phase is completed.
Both Rouhani and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif referred to the dispute over Iran's nuclear program as an "unnecessary crisis". Zarif said the deal was "not perfect for anybody'', but that it was the "best achievement possible that could be reached".
Didn't we say that about the 1994 North Korean deal? That turned out well...
Obama, who is trying to persuade a skeptical US Congress of the benefits, said it would oblige Iran to:
o remove two-thirds of installed centrifuges and store them under international supervision
o get rid of 98% of its enriched uranium
o accept that sanctions would be rapidly restored if the deal was violated
o permanently give the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access "where necessary when necessary"

Sanctions relief would be gradual, Obama said, with an arms embargo remaining in place for five years and an embargo on missiles for eight years.

Separately, the IAEA and Iran said they had signed a roadmap to resolve outstanding issues.

In a televised address, Obama insisted the deal would make the world "safer and more secure", and provided for a rigorous verification regime. "This deal is not built on trust - it is built on verification," he said.
Trust but verify. Who said that, Champ?
Immediately afterwards, Rouhani gave his own televised address, in which he said the prayers of Iranians had "come true".

He said the deal would lead to the removal of all sanctions, adding: "The sanctions regime was never successful, but at the same time it affected people's lives.' After 12 years, world powers had finally "recognized the nuclear activities of Iran", he said.
Updates at 2:38 p.m. ET:
The Times of Israel has what is claimed to be the full text of the 159-page agreement here.

Netanyahu announced that Israel is not bound by the agreement here.

An Nahar has a round up of responses here, and points out that President Obama

...vowed to veto any Congressional effort to block the deal, reached between Tehran and the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany.

Interesting times, ladies and gentlemen.
Remember, Congress passed legislation that gave up the Senate's right to review the treaty and vote on it with a 2/3 majority. Now it takes a 2/3 majority in both houses to STOP it. The Pubs then will wring their hands piously.

Primary the bastards, every one of them.
Posted by:Bobby

#9  OOOOOPPPPSSS, forgot JAPAN TIMES > NUCLEAR DEAL SEENS AS BOOSTING IRAN'S ECONOMY, NOT REGIONAL AGGRESSION.

True enuff, as FUTURE OWG "US-STYLE", "US-PAR", CO-SUPERPOWER IRAN badly needs to modernize its Military-Industrial Complex in support of such status.

Darth Vlad = RUSSIA is pretty much in a POST-MAHANIST STAGE of MilPol-Geopol Dev - IRAN + CHINA, HOWEVER, IMO ARE STILL IN EARLY MAHANIST STAGE OF DEV.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-07-14 23:14  

#8  Taken collectively, AFAIC the new Iran Nuke Deal is another way of saying that ... ...

> IRAN = indeed a future OWG Co-Superpower sibling + BFF/BFRNF of the US, + also ditto ala Putinist Russia + China [Other?].
> IRAN = will likely get "the Bomb" 2020 NLT 2025, the latter also being the time period when Amerika should be mostly or fully suborned under anti-Sovereign UN-based, OWG NAU.

AGAIN, OWG-NWO + GLOBALISM = PARITY WID THE US, NOT INFERIORITY AGZ THE US.

* BLOOMBERG = ... ...
> IRAN DEAL RISKS CLASH WID SAUDIS FOR MIDDLE EAST DOMINANCE.
> CHINA POSES GREATER THREAT TO INDONESIA THAN GREECE, KALLA SAYS.

D *** NG IT, iff the Bammer can surrender like France to IRAN, he can surrender like France as well to CHINA in East Asia-WESTPAC as per China-desired control of 1/2 of the Pacific for its own "Sphere of Influence".

POOR GUAM'S TINY CAMEL ROCK - WE HARDLY KNEW YE!

> IRAN RETURN FROM EXILE POSES CHALLENGE FOR US, ALLIES [IRAN = MilPol-Geopol "Aggressive", + NOT a "Status Quo" Power].

* LUCIANNE = .... ...
> [Independent.UK] IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL: HOWEVER THE GREAT OR GOOD REPRESENT IT, AMERICA HAS NOW [effectively = officially?] TAKEN THE SHIA SIDE IN THE MIDDLE EAST'S SECTARIAN WAR.

WHAT PART OF IRAN = OWG AMERIKA'S "US-STYLE", "US-PAR", CO-SUPERPOWER SIBLING DID WE NOT UNDERSTAND - AGAIN!?

> [Rush Limbaugh] OBAMA DELIVERS [unilaterally gives] VICTORY TO IRAN.

China? Russia? Other?

> [USA Today] IRAN CAN STILL GET THE BOMB.
> [Pajama Medias] OBAMA SIGNS IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL, SAYS BYE-BYE TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

End of Traditional or Historical Western = European domination of Civilization, Religion, + Histoire', ... @etc.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-07-14 23:03  

#7  All who voted for Mr. Obama have their hands dirty bloody.

But wasn't one of the conditions that Iran will not acknowledge the existence of any enriched uranium? What is 98% of zero again?

And asking IAEA to 'verify' is like asking Obama to watch your wallet.

Obama's legacy.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-07-14 21:50  

#6  Deal positive: reliance on the IAEA will assure job opportunities for the visually impaired.
Posted by: Matt   2015-07-14 20:36  

#5  



Posted by: Blossom Unains5562   2015-07-14 20:36  

#4  ...or suddenly a very viral plague outbreak starts in Iran.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-07-14 19:16  

#3  just read thru some of this (annex on inspections)

-its true that the IAEA will get good access to DECLARED sites but for undeclared sites where the IAEA suspects activity, there is a multiple step process to determine access that could easily takes over 2 months
Posted by: lord garth   2015-07-14 16:49  

#2  This is a serious $hit sandwich that is going to take major cleanup. All who voted for Mr. Obama have their hands dirty.

It'll be interesting to see what happens when:
1. PM Netanyahu decides to take matters into his own hands.
2. Obama VlaJar issues "go" codes to the US Military to wall off Israeli preventive action forces.
3. Many US Military commanders are, somehow, unavailable to receive said codes.
Posted by: Hupineger Glomomp52169   2015-07-14 16:22  

#1  I wonder what the agreement says in Farsi and how it is decided 'when/where' the IAEA determines the necessity of inspections
Posted by: lord garth   2015-07-14 15:56  

00:00