You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Bill Johnson: How U.S. is training China's Military while inching toward conflict.
2015-07-27
[Rooters] Despite tensions between the United States and China over the South China Sea, the two nations' militaries train together at a very high level. Current "mil-mil" engagements are robust, with China participating in the world's largest international maritime exercise, RIMPAC 2014, which is hosted biannually by the U.S. Pacific Command. The drills allowed China to learn a great deal about U.S. tactics, techniques and procedures (in military shorthand, "TTPs").

But even as the United States provided China with its highest-level access to military drills, the U.S. military leadership consistently ratcheted up the level of confrontation in the South China Sea. Most recently, a top U.S. Navy admiral participated in a surveillance flight in the region. The United States is at once inching closer to armed confrontation, while at the same time training Chinese forces in the American way of war.

RIMPAC is one of many occasions when U.S. forces have trained their Chinese counterparts. China has participated in U.S.-led counter-piracy operations in the Indian Ocean since 2008. Initially, due to language difficulties and unfamiliarity with American and allied forces tactics, techniques and procedures, China was given a separate area to patrol. But over the last seven years, cooperation has become closer, as the United States sought greater coordination of operations and closer relations with Chinese ships, by conducting combined exercises in 2013 and again in 2014. This increased interoperability allowed Chinese forces to learn counter-piracy tactics, techniques and procedures, especially those relating to how to support ships that are deployed far from land, for long periods of time. They also learned how to properly run visits and time off for their troops in foreign ports, and how to configure ships to be both efficient and comfortable for the seamen. From the U.S. Navy, the Chinese learned that allowing telephone contact with family at home enhanced -- rather than hurt -- troop morale and discipline. The Chinese were also able to study American methods for destroying chemical weapons, as they aided the U.S. Navy in destroying Syria's surrendered weapons.

China has upped the ante by deploying a nuclear submarine escort for its ships engaged in counter-piracy missions -- an added level of protection. To get live training, the United States will track any Chinese submarines as hostile, even in a cooperative environment. China knows this, and is able to use its participation in the international effort to explore the anti-submarine warfare tactics of the U.S. forces stationed on Diego Garcia Island, south of India, as well as those of U.S. and allied forces in the Gulf of Aden.

In other news: March 3, 1939 - Chinese Americans picket scrap metal shipments to Japan.
Posted by:Besoeker

#5  More this AM ...

* BIGNEWSNETWORK > [Forbes] PHILIPPINE BUILDUP AT SUIC RELIES ON US AIR, NAVY TO STOP CHINA.

And iff Anti-US US Globie POTUS Obama = USA doesn't stop China???

* TOPIX > US "RETURN TO ASIA" [Pivot?] FACES MANY REGIONAL OPPONENTS.

* CHINA DEFENSE FORUM > BLOGGER: US' LR "BOMB RUN" TO AUSTRALIA SHOWS US DESIRE TO STRIKE CHINA'S ISLANDS IN SOUTH CHINA SEA WID B-52'S, CHINA SHOULD PLACE TACTICAL NUKES, ETC. ON DISPUTED ISLANDS TO DETER US AGGRESSION.

* SAME > WANT CHINA TIMES: BEIJING COULD DECLARE SOUTH CHINA SEA ADIZ AFTER XI'S US VISIT: EXPERT.

Peter Jennings of AUS Strategic Policy Institute to CSIS.

* PLA DAILY, BIGNEWSNETWORK > JAPAN'S [PM Abe's} DEFENSE POLICY [+ ForPol] OVERTURN "BRINGS ASIA CLOSER TO WAR".

Again, CHINA ideally may try to keep or prevent any US-specific mil intervention AMAP ALAP in any war in the SCS agz PH + Vietnam, ASEAN; andor ECS agz JAPAN, + even the IOR agz INDIA.

GOOD FOR ANTI-US GLOBIES + US-LED ANTI-US OWG-NWO, NOT GOOD FOR US ALLIES = US [pre-OWG]"SOLE" SUPERPOWER CREDIBILITY.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-07-27 22:59  

#4  In ADAM SANDLER'S new movie "PIXELS", Guam's Andersen AFB is attacked by "GALAGA" style Space Aliens - one of POTUS Kevin James' "Situation Room" Advisors is a SEEMINGLY ATTACK-EVERYONE-N-ANYONE-HAPPY USN Admiral = USN CNO/CoS? whom tells James, "MR. PRESIDENT, OUR MISSION IN GUAM WAS "ATTACKED"!.

In my mind, "MISSION" as used above in the Movie strongly inferred or implied that AAFB is a "DIPLOMATIC MISSION" = GUAM IS AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY, OR OTHER, + NOT A US TERRITORY ANYMORE.

It worried me given what is happening in the US-World wid Anti-US US OWG Globalist POTUS OBAMA, right now, espec as his "red lines", Crimea, China + SCS-ECS, ... ...etc. + China's desire to get 1/2 of the Pacific [include Guam-WESTPAC] by 2020 NLT 2025 vee the "Weak/Declining", Ex-Sole-Soon-to-Be-One-of-Many-OWG-Co-Superpower USA.

Hollyweird + MSM-Net starting to SUBTLY put out the notion that the US SSSSHHH ... CCCCC doesn't need Guam anymore, at least as a sovereign territory of the US. ALL THE ANTI-US GLOBAIES NEED IS THE PCORRECT, ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL EXCUSE OF AVOIDING NUCWAR WID CHINA IN EAST-SOUTH CHINA SEAS + IOR TO HAND OVER GUAM TO CHINA'S WESTPAC "SPHERE OF INFLUENCE"???

* Again, WORLD MILITARY FORUM > GLOBAL TIMES: EXPERT: GUAM + CNMI IS FAR AWAY FROM THE US, WHY DOESN'T THE US GIVE THEM UP!?

Guam-WESTPAC now by 2020 NLT 2025, Hawaii-EASTPAC + 1/2 of CONUS-NORAM later???

* FYI SAME > NEW US PACOM CHIEF ADM. HARRIS: CHINA-IMPROVED/CONSTRUCTED ISLANDS IN SOUTH CHINA SEA IS DEFINITEY FOR "MILITARY PURPOSES" [NOT just for PCorrect "Civilian" uses], I.E. EVENTUAL BASING OF PLA MILITARY AIRCRAFT, WARSHIPS, + SURVEILLANCE, ETC.

* SAME > SINA MILITARY: CHINESE BALLISTIC MISSLES CAN DESTROY ANY AIRFIELD OR AIRPORT IN THE MOSTLY PRO-US "FIRST ISLAND CHAIN". SIMULATED ATTACK AGZ JAPAN'S US-SHARED KADENA AIR FORCE BASE.

* SAME > CHINA'S CRUISE MISSLES CARRIER NEGATES/REMOVES NEED FOR PLAAF AIR BOMBING OVER JAPAN.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-07-27 22:43  

#3  As said before, CHINA must decide what is or what are its National Priorities at this point in time, i.e. SHOULD IT CONTINUE ITS STRUGGLE FOR UNCONDITIONAL, UN-OPPOSED "STRATEGIC ACCESS" AGZ THE MAINLY PRO-US/WEST, ANTI-CHINA NATIONS IN EAST ASIA + IOR, OR IN ALTERN DELAY ITS DESIRED "POST-US" MANIFEST DESTINY = GEOPOL AMBITIONS KNOWING THAT SAIDSAME US ALLIES IN EAST ASIA WILL LIKELY BECOME MILPOL STRONGER VEE CHINA IN THE FUTURE, + THAT HENCE IT MAY BECOME MORE DIFFCULT FOR CHINA TO ACHIEVE ITS AGENDUM, IFF AT ALL.

* OWG GLOBALISTS = iff China is indeed to become a new "US-STYLE","US-PAR" OWG "Co-Superpower" sibling of the US, wid its own China-dominated "Sphere(s) of Influence", THEN ITS THE PHILIPPINES, VIETNAM, + JAPAN, ETC. = POTUS OBAMA + US WHOM MUST CONCEDE TO CHINA'S DEMANDS VEE THE SOUTH CHINA SEA + EAST CHINA SEA, ETC.

> SOLE SUPERPOWER OR CO-SUPERPOWER = CHINA, ETAL. M-U-S-T HAVE OVERSEAS MILBASES FOR PROTECTION OF TRADE + PROJECTION OF MILITARY OR MILPOL POWER.
> PEACE = CHINA WON'T BE A "US-STYLE/PAR" SOLE OR CO-SUPERPOWER FOR MANY YEARS OR DECADES TO COME.
> WAR = CHINA STILL HAS A CHANCE, OR FEW CHANCES, FOR SAME TO ACHIEVE A BETTER, MORE EFFECTIVE POSITION VEE THE US IN THE PRESENT ANDOR THE FUTURE.

Lastly, as a reminder China, etal. "ace" agz the US is NOTSOMUCH defeating the US Navy-DOD, BUT HAVING AN ANTI-AMERICAN AMERIKAN GLOBALIST POTUS IN THE WHITE HOUSE + #1 [Other?] ON THE US NATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITY.

POTUS Bammer is responsible for the DIRECT US RESPONSE TO any MilPol or Natural Crisis around the World, or in alternat the LACK OF SAME.

HIS ANTI-US US-LED GLOBALISM ASIDE, WE SEE IT PCORRECTLY-DENIABLY VEE IRAN + NUCLEAR DEAL > OBAMA = "WE [US] EITHER MAKE PEACE AND SEEK COMPROMISE WID IRAN, OR ITS WAR [includ possible NUCWAR]".

IT WILL BE ROUGHLY THE SAME VEE CHINA + PUTINIST RUSSIA, OTHER GLOBIE-DESIRED CO-SUPERPOWERS?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-07-27 19:50  

#2  RIMPAC
Thats different than rimjob, right?
Posted by: Skidmark   2015-07-27 10:34  

#1  The British and French trained with and trained Germans right up until WW1 too.

Posted by: DarthVader   2015-07-27 10:17  

00:00