You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
The Coddling of the American Mind
2015-08-12
[THEATLANTIC] Something strange is happening at America’s colleges and universities. A movement is arising, undirected and driven largely by students, to scrub campuses clean of words, ideas, and subjects that might cause discomfort or give offense.
Because that sort of thing's really important when you're looking for a good job as an art historian or interpretive dancing.
Last December, Jeannie Suk wrote in an online article for The New Yorker about law students asking her fellow professors at Harvard not to teach rape law—or, in one case, even use the word violate (as in “that violates the law”) lest it cause students distress.
All that canola oil they've been using for cooking or as a personal lubricant used to be known as "rapeseed oil."
In February, Laura Kipnis, a professor at Northwestern University, wrote an essay in The Chronicle of Higher Education describing a new campus politics of sexual paranoia—and was then subjected to a long investigation after students who were offended by the article and by a tweet she’d sent filed Title IX complaints against her. In June, a professor protecting himself with a pseudonym wrote an essay for Vox describing how gingerly he now has to teach. “I’m a Liberal Professor, and My Liberal Students Terrify Me,” the headline said.
You grew 'em, now live with 'em.
A number of popular comedians, including Chris Rock, have stopped performing on college campuses. Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Maher have publicly condemned the oversensitivity of college students, saying too many of them can’t take a joke.
Bet that really fired up the sensitive little boogers.
Two terms have risen quickly from obscurity into common campus parlance. Microaggressions are small actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thought of as a kind of violence nonetheless. For example, by some campus guidelines, it is a microaggression to ask an Asian American or Latino American “Where were you born?,” because this implies that he or she is not a real American.
In the event the sense of humor returns, possible responses include "I'm from Noo Joisey. Are you from Noo Joisey?" and "I'm not sure. I was pretty young then."
Trigger warnings are alerts that professors are expected to issue if something in a course might cause a strong emotional response. For example, some students have called for warnings that Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart describes racial violence and that F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby portrays misogyny and physical abuse, so that students who have been previously victimized by racism or domestic violence can choose to avoid these works, which they believe might “trigger” a recurrence of past trauma.
Thereby putting F. Scott Fitzgerald into the same category as artillery.
Some recent campus actions border on the surreal. In April, at Brandeis University, the Asian American student association sought to raise awareness of microaggressions against Asians through an installation on the steps of an academic hall. The installation gave examples of microaggressions such as “Aren’t you supposed to be good at math?” and “I’m colorblind! I don’t see race.” But a backlash arose among other Asian American students, who felt that the display itself was a microaggression. The association removed the installation, and its president wrote an e-mail to the entire student body apologizing to anyone who was “triggered or hurt by the content of the microaggressions.”
There remains at the site a fairly long article discussing similar claptrap. Feel free to read it and weep for the nation that raised Daniel Boone, Kit Carson, and William Barrett Travis.
Posted by:Fred

#5  "Thereby putting F. Scott Fitzgerald into the same category as artillery."

That is one of the best inline comments I've read.
Posted by: Penguin   2015-08-12 22:52  

#4  I think the word you are thinking of is snowflakes. Our collages and universities are filled with delicate snowflakes who were carried around by their parents, and school teachers so much that they would melt if they ever had to actually touch the ground....

Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-08-12 19:46  

#3  We are turning our college students into a bunch of hothouse flowers that get offended by nearly everything.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-08-12 18:24  

#2  Public universities were originally A&Ms - agricultural and mechanical. In other words, practical education for skills the society depended upon (and still do for the fundamentals food and energy). They've long dispensed with that justification for their existence. They should go back to A&Ms - (practical) application and medical.

The other problem has been societal extension of childhood. You protect children, but adults are expected to deal with the reality of life and its challenges. As Instaprof alludes to, too many 'children' are in college. If they can't deal with it, they should not be there.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-08-12 11:42  

#1  Let me give you a hint: the purpose of higher education is not to improve one's earning ability.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-08-12 01:55  

00:00