You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Is This the Warship of the Future?
2015-09-01
Re: Steve White's posting of 30 Aug.
[DefenseOne] If you thought the battleship era faded after World War II, just wait a few decades. A group of British designers with the Startpoint group have revealed concept art for a future warship called Dreadnought 2050, the product of an open-thought experiment at the informal request of the U.K. Ministry of Defense.

Named for the 1905 British man-of-war that rendered its predecessors obsolete, Dreadnought 2050 has all the futuristic accessories that a mid-21st-century warship shouldn't be without. The ship is powered by hydrogen fusion -- or if that proves unworkable, then at least by "highly efficient turbines driving silent electric motors to waterjets." The hull is composed of "ultra-strong" composites of the finest acrylic. Out back, there's a floodable dock for launching Royal Marines and swimming drones, a deck for launching armed aerial drones, and 3D printers to make more as needed. The designers don't specify the size of their new dreadnought, but they imagine it would replace a ship with a crew of about 200 -- perhaps making it comparable to the U.S. Navy's 15,000-ton Zumwalt-class destroyer.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#10  Need to get going mining the unobtanium for the hull
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-09-01 22:08  

#9  He forgot the Phasers and Photon Torpedoes.

And of course the Wave Motion Gun in the bow.

What's a swimming drone? Wouldn't that be a marine drone or unmanned boat?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-09-01 17:49  

#8  I think the future is subs that can deploy drones and or ships that can deploy a dozen disposable PT-type boats. Consider the ships expendable and you can cut the crew down to nothing.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-09-01 14:58  

#7  Just hope that the spec sheet excludes Lucas as the electronics supplier (unless they really want to go to The Dark Side)
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2015-09-01 14:45  

#6  How about a battleship with Gauss guns?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-09-01 09:37  

#5  The object is to deliver ordnance on target at a specific point or target. The fiddlely part is how much ordnance, cause delivering a 1 kiloton device would usually take out most targets.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-09-01 09:33  

#4  I am not sure paper written by a a sci-fi addict teenage accurataly depicts this text. Drunk, high on crack sci-fi addict teenager would becloser to the target.
Posted by: JFM   2015-09-01 08:01  

#3  THe fundamental problem of the battleship is that it was totally outranged by the aircraft carrier and that even the mighty Yamato could be sunk by a carrier at the cost of a few aircraft. That meant an exchange rate of two or three thousand men against twenty or thirty and a gazillion dollars (in 2015 terms) a against a, by comparison tiny amount of money and resources.

For the article it looks more like a paper written by sfi-addict teenager than by qualifiued personel. Just think in the "ultra-strong composites" (I don't doubt by 2050 there will also be ultra-string explosives) and the 3D printers making drones (with all their electronics requiring silicon pure to about one atom of something else in a _billion_ atoms of silicon. Also apparently those "experts" didn't even think in equipping it with Gauss guns in order to fill the range gap with aircraft carriers. For the drones, if your primary weapon is a fleet of drones then you are not a battleship but an aircraft carrier that happens to be operating unmanned vehicles.
Posted by: JFM   2015-09-01 07:57  

#2  Don't forget a long spike on the bow, so that they can ram enemy ships. (sarcasm)
Posted by: ed in texas   2015-09-01 07:54  

#1  And sharks with frikin lasers attached to their heads.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2015-09-01 01:20  

00:00