Submit your comments on this article |
-Land of the Free |
Champ Weighs Executive Action on Guns |
2015-10-09 |
Probably make the announcement in Roseburg. President Obama is seriously considering circumventing Congress with his executive authority and imposing new background-check requirements for buyers who purchase weapons from high-volume gun dealers. Under the proposed rule change, dealers who exceed a certain number of sales each year would be required to obtain a license from ATF and perform background checks on potential buyers. As the president heads to Roseburg, Ore., on Friday to comfort the survivors and families of those killed in last week's mass shooting at Umpqua Community College, the political calculus around his most vexing domestic policy issue is shifting once again. Most vexing issue? Did I tellya this was the WaPo? "We are hopeful we can find a way to do this," said one senior administration official, who noted that lawyers were still working through details to ensure that the rule could pass legal muster. "It's a lot more clear today than it was a year ago how to work this out." Why not make the announcement in gun-free Chicago, and combine it with the announcement of the release of 6,000 felons? White House officials drafted the proposal in late 2013 to apply to those dealers who sell at least 50 guns annually, after Congress had rejected legislation that would have expanded background checks more broadly to private sellers. While the White House Office of Legal Counsel and then-Attorney General Holder initially concluded the regulation was legally defensible, according to several individuals involved in the discussions, some federal lawyers remained concerned that setting an arbitrary numerical threshold could leave the rule vulnerable to a challenge. Arbitrary smarbitary! People are dying! My people. ATF officials, moreover, objected that it would be hard to enforce [deep breath] Whew! There ya go. Now no one else needs to hold their nose and cover their eyes to go to the WaPo site. |
Posted by:Bobby |
#9 Doesn't matter if the courts don't enforce it ... |
Posted by: Sven the pelter 2015-10-09 19:51 |
#8 |
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2015-10-09 16:16 |
#7 Would like to see executive Action on the 16th Amendment. Income tax is a form of slavery. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2015-10-09 15:41 |
#6 Misuse the executive orders so the public thinks poorly of the tactic so that the next Administration (likely Republican) can't use the tactic often or even openly. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2015-10-09 15:31 |
#5 The game is two-fold: first, of course, to accomplish the stated goal, whatever it might be. But second, and actually more valuable, to keep angering the conservatives so they can point at them as nothing more than angry simpletons that reasonable, thoughtful, intelligent people should ignore. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2015-10-09 14:16 |
#4 Second that emotion. |
Posted by: Bobby 2015-10-09 12:18 |
#3 I never wanted a gun until Obama started trying to outlaw them. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2015-10-09 11:52 |
#2 I echo Gunnery Sergeant Burghardt's take on this.
| |
Posted by: DarthVader 2015-10-09 10:05 |
#1 Under the proposed rule change, dealers who exceed a certain number of sales each year would be required to obtain a license from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and perform background checks on potential buyers. This all happens already. Gun dealers have to go through a stringent process and background checks to obtain dealer's licenses. They are required to perform background checks on buyers. Unless, of course, you work for the government and are a part of some illegal boondoggle like "Fast and Furious." |
Posted by: JohnQC 2015-10-09 08:45 |