You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Ted Cruz vs Sierra Club president
2015-10-10
Motl is a Czech physicist who has had enough of communist nonsense. I follow his blog because I like physics and he is very smart but also because I like his instincts.
Sierra Club is an environmental organization founded in 1892. The organization supports the climate alarmism in the maximum way. Normally, you would expect the president of an organization that says to care about the Earth and the environment - and the climate - to know at least something. You would normally expect he knows more than a conservative Republican politician.

But you would be totally wrong. The video above shows that the president of the Sierra Club doesn't have the slightest clue about the basic facts concerning the climate change issue. He's much more ignorant than an average schoolkid who has spent 30 minutes by reading sources about this stuff. Aaron Mair's knowledge of the science is clearly much closer to the knowledge of an average gorilla.

After a short nonconstructive conversation about the Sierra Club's desire to make any debate about the climate science impossible, Cruz asked Mair about the basically vanishing trend in the global mean temperature in the recent 18 years, according to the satellite (UAH or RSS) measurements.

Mair didn't know what the temperature or the satellites meant. So he consulted his staff all the time - like the stupidest kid in the classroom who always has to cheat and be helped by his classmates. The staff didn't know much more. When Cruz asked about the meaning of "the pause", Mair said he knew what it was but he clearly didn't have a clue about it, either. After he talked to his staff, they decided that it was a pause in the warming in the 1940s. Well, that's not what is referred to as "the pause". Even with some basic intelligence, they could have guessed that it was referring to the recent 18 years but Mair and his staff clearly don't have the basic intelligence, either.
Posted by:Sven the pelter

#4  When the zombie apocalypse strikes, I'm hoping only lefties will be effected. I'll feel so safe because they have no need for brains.
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2015-10-10 11:40  

#3  I suspect that poll would be less dependent on available facts and data, and more dependent on the availability of the grant $ they are addicted to.

Science is NEVER settled for real scientists
Posted by: Frank G   2015-10-10 11:11  

#2  Not only is the 97% claim an anti-scientific argument and an inaccurate conclusion from the referenced studies, but the studies are old information from before all the recent discoveries of additional factors impacting climate. Not that it matters, but it would be interesting to see how a poll of scientists or a survey of publications would look now that the Pause is a thing and the large cooling impact of volatile organic compounds has been discovered.
Posted by: trailing wife   2015-10-10 10:37  

#1  The moral of this particular story is: don't send somebody up against a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, chaired by the likes of Ted Cruz (or Trey Gowdy), unless your spokesperson is prepared to respond to direct questioning with something more specific than canned pre-rehearsed answers


For those who have not seen the entire hearing:
Sen. Cruz Hearing: Opportunity Denied: How Over-regulation Harms Minorities Full Video ,
It is worth watching:
(Aaron Mair's testimony starts at the 48:00 min. mark - and ends at 54:00 min. mark)


In his written testimony, Aaron Mair, president of the Sierra Club, asserted that: "Foes of EPA live in an alternative universe in which corporate polluters use propaganda to persuade vulnerable low-income Americans to oppose anti-pollution efforts. That people of color and low-income communities are disproportionately impacted by pollution and climate disruption should not be up for debate any more so than the science behind climate change itself."

"Over-regulation is stifling opportunity for people who want to achieve the American dream," Mr. Cruz said.
But Cruz then adamantly took issue with Mair's contention that climate change is not up for debate.

When given the proper time, in an open forum, Sen. Cruz's debate performances are nothing short of masterful. Cruz knows how to frame each argument in a way that focuses on hard information currently at hand, and is adept at bringing a "deflected off the rails argument" back on track when necessary.


Mr. Mair's entire repeated response boiled down to "We concur with 97 percent of the scientists that believe the anthropogenic impact of mankind with regards to global warming are true." --- Which otherwise would have been considered a suitable response had Sen. Cruz not been far more familiar with the origin of that particular talking point, and indeed more knowledgeable in every other aspect concerning the entire topic of global warming.

Cruz's point about satellite data is based on science.
Mr. Mair's answer is based on what many would contend to be faulty and distorted statistical analysis.
Seriously, it looks very bad for your cause, when the president of your organization (Aaron Mair) has to constantly be fed pre-rehearsed lines by his staff.

Indeed, it could be said that Aaron Mair was proven to be the "science denier," and Ted Cruz the champion of science, if all available data and scientific evidence is properly acknowledged, well understood, and left unmanipulated.
Posted by: junkiron   2015-10-10 09:00  

00:00